What is the ratio between the speeds before and after a short rocket thrust?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed ratio of a satellite before and after a short rocket thrust that alters its orbit from a circular path around the sun to an elliptical orbit with an aphelion at Jupiter's radius. The thrust is applied parallel to the satellite's velocity, maintaining equal radii before and after. The eccentricity of the new orbit is calculated as 0.677, using the distances of Earth's and Jupiter's orbits. The user seeks to determine the perihelion speed and considers using the vis-viva equation based on energy conservation principles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding orbital mechanics to derive the necessary speed calculations accurately.
alex3
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite is in a circular orbit around the sun, radius r_{e}, the radius of Earth's orbit. After a short rocket thrust parallel to its velocity, it is in a new orbit with aphelion at Jupiter's orbital radius, r_{j}. What is the ratio of the speed's just before and after the thrust?

2. The attempt at a solution

I'm thinking like this:

  • The thrust is parallel to the velocity and is for a very short time, so the radii before and after the thrust are equal.
  • The aphelion is at Jupiter's orbital radius: the satellite is now describing an elliptical orbit, with an aphelion at Jupiter's orbital radius, and an perihelion at the thrust point; Earth's orbital radius.
  • We need the speed just after the thrust, so we need what the speed would be at the perihelion of the orbit.

Ok so far? I've worked out the eccentricity by using the following logic:

  • The sun is at one focus.
  • The major axis is the A = r_{j} + r_{e}, semi-major is a = \frac{A}{2}.
  • The distance from the centre of the ellipse to the focus is ae, so the eccentricity can be calculated using a - ae = r_{e} and solving for e.

I calculated 0.677 for e, using

r_{j} = 7.8 \times 10^{11}
r_{e} = 1.5 \times 10^{11}

But how can I deduce the perihelion speed with this data?

EDIT

Is it just as simple as, by energy conservation, using the vis viva equation and setting r to r_e, or will I need some additional calculation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vis-viva should do fine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top