What is the Region Bounded by a Unit Circle in the yz Plane and x = 0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral of y²z² over a specified region W, which is bounded by the surface defined by x = 1 - y² - z² and the plane x = 0. The context involves understanding the geometric interpretation of the region in relation to a unit circle in the yz-plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the geometric nature of the region, questioning whether it is simply a circle or a more complex shape like a paraboloid. There are discussions about the correct limits of integration and the implications of using different coordinate systems, such as Cartesian versus cylindrical coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and suggestions for setting up the integral. Some participants express confusion over the limits of integration and the presence of variables in those limits, while others recommend different approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly identifying the boundaries of the region and the potential complications that arise from integrating in different coordinate systems. There is also mention of homework constraints that may affect the approach taken.

joemama69
Messages
390
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



evaluate the integral y2z2dV over W, which is the region bounded by x = 1 - y2 - z2 adn the plane x = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



since x = 0, that makes y2 + z2 = 1, unit circle in the yz plane right?

so would the answer be the area of the circle times y2z2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joemama69 said:
evaluate the integral y2z2dV over W, which is the region bounded by x = 1 - y2 - z2 adn the plane x = 0

so would the answer be the area of the circle times y2z2

uhh? the answer is a number … how can ∫∫∫ y2z2dV have any y or z in it? :confused:
 
Draw the region. You will see that it is a paraboloid with a maximum at y=z=0 and x=1. The paraboloid is cut off at x=0 so the region looks like the top of paraboloid. Which is not just a circle.
 


Those integration limits are not correct. For A) if your integration order is dzdydx there will be a z left in your answer. Every other order of integration has a similar problem so it can't be right.

For B) you don't integrate over x,y and z, but over r, theta and x. This means you've to find limits for r, theta and x. The polar coordinates in this case would be [itex]x=x, y=r \cos \theta, z=r \sin \theta,y^2+z^2=r^2[/itex]. Try to find the correct boundaries for both A and B. Realize the region is a paraboloid with an extremum at 1 on the x-axis and cut off by the yz-plane.

I will leave it for you to decide which one is easier.
 


You might try first swapping x and z so that the integrand is [itex]x^2y^2dV[/itex] and the bounding surfaces are [math]z= 1- x^2- y^2[/math] and z= 0.

In cylindrical coordinates that would be [itex](r^2cos^(\theta)r^2sin^2(\theta) rdrd\theta dz= r^5 sin^2(\theta)cos^2(\theta)[/itex] and the boundaries [math]z= 10- r^2[/math] and z= 0.
 


Well I was originally thinking polar was easier but i think I've changed my mind.

BTW I am not using x2y2 and z = 1 - x2 - y2, z = 0

I need help setting up my limits

z.. 0 to 1 - x2 - y2

x... -(1-y2)1/2 to 1-y2)1/2

y... -1 to 1

whats right and what's wrong
 


So you are integrating over the region bounded by [itex]z= 1- x^2- y^2[/itex] and z= 0?

I would recommend converting to cylindrical coordinates: [itex]x= r cos(\theta)[/itex] and [itex]y= r sin(\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]z= 1- r^2[/itex]. Don't forget that the "differential of volume" in cylindrical coordinates is [itex]dV= r dr d\theta[/itex].

If you are required to do this in rectangular coordinates (or just want to), then, yes, your limits of integration are correct. Projecting the parboloid onto the z= 0 plane, you get the circle [itex]x^2+ y^2= 1[/itex]. y going from -1 to 1 will cover that and, for any given y, x will go from [itex]-\sqrt{1- y^2}[/itex] to [itex]\sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex]. Finally, for any given x and y, z going from 0 to [itex]1- x^2- y^2[/itex] will cover the solid.
 
Ok, i tried it in cylindrical but i got my limts wrong

z is from 0 to 1-r2

r is from 0 to [tex]\sqrt{1-z}[/tex]

theta is from 0 to pi
 
You switched z and x around right? You can't have a z in your limits, it will mean you end up with a variable. The radii of the circular slices vary from the base r=1 to the top r=0. Also to integrate over the full circular slice you need to adjust your [itex]\theta[/itex] limits.
 
  • #10
im integrating over dz,dr,dQ Q = theta

dz = 0 to 1-r2

dr = 0 to 1

dQ = 0 to 2pi

[tex]\int\int\int[/tex]r4cos2Q sin2Q r dz dr dQ
 
  • #11
Yes that should give you the same answer as the Cartesian method.
 
  • #12
ok i got stuck integrating

in integrated z and pluged in the limits and now I am integrating r

[tex]\int[/tex](r5 - r7)cos2Q sin2Q dr = 1/24 ...

1/24 [tex]\int[/tex] cos2Q sin2Q dQ =

1/24 [tex]\int[/tex] ( - /sin2Q) sin2Q dQ =

1/24 [tex]\int[/tex] sin2Q - sin4Q dQ =

Now I am stuck... my calculator gave me pi/4, but how do i do it by hand
 
  • #13
[itex]sin^2(Q)- sin^4(Q)= sin^2Q(1- sin^2(Q))= sin^2(Q)cos^2(Q)[/itex]
Use trig identities [itex]sin^2(Q)= (1/2)(1- cos(Q))[/itex], [itex]cos^2(Q)= (1/2)(1+ cos(Q))[/itex]. You may need to use those twice.
 
  • #14
i haven't those identities in a while

1/24 [tex]\int[/tex]cos2Q sin2Q dQ =

1/24 [tex]\int[/tex](1/2 + 1/2 cosQ)(1/2 - 1/2 cosQ) dQ =

1/96 [tex]\int[/tex](1 + cos2Q) dQ =

1/96 [tex]\int[/tex](1 + 1/2 + 1/2 cosQ) dQ =

1/96 [tex]\int[/tex](3/2 + 1/2 cosQ) dQ =

1/96 (3Q/2 + 1/2 sinQ)] from 0 to 2pi = pi/32

my calc said it was pi/4 do u see any problems
 
  • #15
I would personally start out with [itex]\cos^2 \theta \sin^2 \theta=(\cos \theta \sin \theta)^2=\frac{1}{4}\sin^2 (2\theta)[/itex]. This way you can skip a few steps.

You used Halls identities which are incorrect the correct ones are [itex]\cos^2x=\frac{1}{2}(1+\cos 2x),\sin^2x=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos 2x)[/itex]. Note the double angle.
 
  • #16
ok when i integrated with the last identity i got pi/96 did u get this too
 
  • #17
I got pi/96.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K