What is the Relationship Between Electrostatic Force and Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic force is directly related to potential energy, with attractive forces decreasing as distance increases. The lowest potential energy occurs when two objects are closest together, as the attractive force indicates lower potential energy at smaller separations. This relationship mirrors gravitational interactions, where the force between two objects diminishes with distance, while potential energy increases as they move apart. The analogy highlights that even at zero potential energy, an attractive force still exists. Understanding this relationship is crucial in classical physics.
Bassel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hi, please can anyone analyze the following sentence in terms of the formulas of electrostatic forces or Potential energy (assuming electrostatic force is directly proportional to potential energy)
statement: "When the force between two objects is attractive and decreases with distance, the lowest potential energy level for those objects is when they are the CLOSEST to each other."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
assuming electrostatic force is directly proportional to potential energy
Force is proportional to the gradient of the potential energy. Actually, they are not just proportional, they are the same.[/size]

The attractive force alone is sufficient here - it is another way to say "potential is lower for a smaller separation".

I moved the thread to classical physics, as I don't see a relation to nuclear or particle physics.
 
Let's draw an analogy with gravity. A tennis ball and the Earth are two objects that are attracted to each other and the force between them falls as 1/r2. When they are touching each other (i.e. the ball is on the ground) there is zero potential energy but at the same time there is some attractive force between them. When you move the tennis ball away from the earth, let's say you increase the distance by Δr, then the force decreases due to the 1/r2 relationship, but at the same time, it's potential energy increased.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top