What is the relationship between force and potential energy in elastic systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flazer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between force and potential energy in elastic systems, specifically in the context of Hooke's law. It highlights the need to calculate average force when determining work done by a spring, as the spring force is not constant but varies linearly. The average force during stretching is derived as F_average = kx/2, which simplifies the calculation of work done. The potential energy is represented as the area under the force versus displacement curve, prompting a comparison with a constant force that would yield the same area. This explanation emphasizes the significance of average force in the work-energy theorem for elastic potential energy.
flazer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Who can explain me why we need to find an average force in proving theorem work=elastic potensial energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If elastic potential energy (lets call it U) is the only energy involved, then W = - U. Remember, in using Hookes law, that if W = force times distance, the spring force is not constant, so you need to use calculus to find the work, or simply note that the spring force varies from 0 to its max value of kx.
 
I do not know calculus so please can someone explaın me wıthout usıng calculus
 
If the initial force in the spring is 0, and the force varies linearly with x (F=kx) as it is stretched, then at its maximum point of stretch , the force is F=kx, where x is at its maximum. So the average force during that period of stretch is just (0 + kx)/2, or F_average =kx/2. Now use that value of force in your work equation to find the work done by the spring.
 
On the graph of F vs. x, the potential energy is equal to the area under the curve between 0 and x. What constant force would have the same area underneath?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top