What is the Relationship Between Friction and Mass of an Object on a Slope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daisy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Mass
AI Thread Summary
The relationship between friction and mass on a slope indicates that increasing the mass of an object does not change the angle required for it to slide down. As mass increases, both the weight force and friction force increase proportionally, maintaining the same limiting slope angle. The coefficient of friction remains constant across various loads, ensuring that the angle at which the object begins to slide does not decrease with increased mass. Experimentation should focus on recording actual results rather than expected outcomes. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate experimental analysis.
Daisy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I was just wondering if someone could enlighten me on the relationship between friction and mass of object.

For instance, if i have an object of mass 100g going down a slope… what happens if i increase the mass of object to 200g? will the angle of the slope increase or decrease for the object to move down it?

Im assuming as mass of object increases, angle of slope decreases. Can somebody correct me if I'm wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi daisy

why would you think the angle of the slope would change ?
 
Well I'm doing an experiment at home. So the point of this experiment is to use different masses of objects and record the angle of the slope at which the object first starts to slide down. So I've been increasing my object mass but my angles are decreasing.
 
for ease
work out a change in mass on a fixed angle slope. and once familiar with what is happening there
THEN start changing the slope angle to see what the effect is :smile:

cheers
Dave
 
If you look at this wiki article, you will see the information you need. The Coefficient of friction is constant over a very wide range of loads. That means that, if you double the mass (weight force), the friction force doubles, too, so the limiting slope will be the same.
 
sophiecentaur said:
If you look at this wiki article, you will see the information you need. The Coefficient of friction is constant over a very wide range of loads. That means that, if you double the mass (weight force), the friction force doubles, too, so the limiting slope will be the same.

If you are doing an experiment, you should write down the results you actually get, not the results you think you should get.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top