What is the relationship between matrix dimensions in state space control?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between matrix dimensions in state space control, specifically the input matrix Bu in the state equation x_dot = Ax + Bu. It is established that the dimensions of A and B must satisfy the equation dim(A) + dim(B) = dim(x), where x represents the state vector. The conversation highlights that A is always a square matrix, reflecting the need for each state in vector x to interact with every other state. Additionally, it is noted that if A lacks full rank, the dimensions of x_dot and x may not align, yet they still represent the states and their derivatives. Ultimately, A and B serve as mathematical representations of state interactions and input influences.
kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
Hello, I want to verify this question.

In short,
"Where did input matrix Bu arise from?"

I was wondering why the state equation has to be in the form of x_dot=Ax+Bu. I got to the point that the highest order terms can be expressed in the form of linear superposition of lower degree terms.

If that is the case, we can find dim(x)=n. (state vector in R^n)
Also because d/dt is a linear operator, dim(x_dot)=dim(x) (because we need n terms to uniquely determine x_dot).

And this gives a conclusion that dim(A)+dim(B)=dim(x). which means, Bu is compensating dimension for the 2nd order differential terms (since x_dot's 2nd order terms are linear superposition of lower differential terms)

Professor told me that, x_dot doesn't need to be in the same dimension in the case that if A has a nullity greater than 1 (A doesn't have full rank)

but considering the canonical solution, wouldn't they have to be in the same dimension?
 

Attachments

  • Control.png
    Control.png
    57.4 KB · Views: 415
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Control_Systems/State-Space_Equations

go down the section heading
Matrix Dimensions

Per my understanding A will always be a square matrix. This is due to the fact that every state in the X vector must be multiplies by every other state. Now if A is not full rank, there will be a section of the matrix that will have multiple or infinite possibilities. Now this might be something you don't care about for certain states, or something that doesn't matter. I suppose when representing your state equations you can show only part of the Xdot values, as many of the others simply do not matter. However in that case they would still 'exist.' they simply would not be written down on paper.

kidsasd987 said:
dim(A)+dim(B)=dim(x)
follow the link. B and A will have different dimensions. X and Xdot are and will always be vectors of the states and their derivatives. A and B are simply sized based on the number of states and the number of inputs. They are the mathematical representations of how the states relate to one another, and how they are affected by the inputs.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top