MHB What is the relationship between the incenter and orthocenter of a triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the geometric relationship between the incenter and orthocenter of a triangle, specifically regarding the angle between the extended line CH and HI, which is proposed to measure half of angle B. The conversation touches on the impossibility of trisecting an angle using only a non-graduated ruler and compass, although some specific angles can be trisected. The focus is on providing a geometric proof for the angle measurement in question. Participants are seeking hints and guidance to develop this proof. The exploration of these geometric properties highlights the complexities involved in triangle constructions.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
30kdffq.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I see before 'attacking' the problem is that, without any serious failure of me, the 'demonstration' [if any...] would also demonstrate that trisection of an angle with only non graduate ruler and compass is possible... or not?... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
trisection of an angle with only non graduate ruler and compass is possible... or not?...
It is impossible to trisect any angle with only non graduate ruler and compass ,but some angles are possible, and this is unrelated to this problem .
 
Last edited:
Albert said:
30kdffq.jpg
I need to show that the angle between $CH$(extended) and $HI$ measures $\frac{\angle B}{2}$. I am trying to give a purely geometric proof of this. Any hints on these lines?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top