What is the relationship between the metric tensor and spacetime?

student85
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I'm taking a GR course right now, my first one. I was reading the textbook and I was wondering if you guys could help me out just to make sure I'm getting things straight here. I'm reading about the metric tensor, and I'm pretty sure I am expected to know what the metric tensor for a given spacetime is, if the line element if given to me. So, say we have this line element:

ds2=ev(r)dt2-e\lambda(r)dr2-r2(d\theta2+sin2\thetad\phi2)
Is the metric tensor simply the coefficients of each differential arranged in the diagonal of a matrix, with the rest of the elements in it equal to zero? Or am I way off here?

NOTE: The Thetas and the phi in the expression are not supposed to be exponentials, I don't know why they came out that way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
student85 said:
Hi guys. I'm taking a GR course right now, my first one. I was reading the textbook and I was wondering if you guys could help me out just to make sure I'm getting things straight here. I'm reading about the metric tensor, and I'm pretty sure I am expected to know what the metric tensor for a given spacetime is, if the line element if given to me. So, say we have this line element:

ds2=ev(r)dt2-e\lambda(r)dr2-r2(d\theta2+sin2\thetad\phi2)
Is the metric tensor simply the coefficients of each differential arranged in the diagonal of a matrix, with the rest of the elements in it equal to zero? Or am I way off here?

The line element is related to the metric tensor as follows:

ds^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}.

So, yes, for this line element, the metric tensor is diagonal. Note that, in general, the metric tensor can have off diagonal terms.

NOTE: The Thetas and the phi in the expression are not supposed to be exponentials, I don't know why they came out that way.

Inline latex is obtained by using brackets.
 
student85 said:
Is the metric tensor simply the coefficients of each differential arranged in the diagonal of a matrix, with the rest of the elements in it equal to zero? Or am I way off here?

NOTE: The Thetas and the phi in the expression are not supposed to be exponentials, I don't know why they came out that way.

Hi student85! :smile:

(type "itex" instead of "tex", and it gives you in-line tex, which fits better. :wink:)

Yes … the coefficients of dsomething2 go into the diagoanl positions in the matrix.

And if the line element contained a mixed term, for example, dxdt, then half of the coefficent would go into each of the two corresponding off-diagonal positions.
 
Thanks guys!
I love this forum!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top