What is the relationship between weight and g-force in determining F?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aqeelz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion G-force
AI Thread Summary
The equation F = ma + mg is discussed in relation to g-force, where mg represents weight due to gravity. The confusion arises from differentiating between gravitational force and the net force experienced during acceleration, such as on a roller coaster. It is clarified that g-force includes both the gravitational force and any additional forces experienced, leading to the equation F = m(g + a). The discussion emphasizes that while weight is a component of g-force, the term "g-force" can also encompass other forces acting on an object. Ultimately, the distinction between weight and g-force is more about semantics than fundamental physics.
Aqeelz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Can you clarify for me the equation for g-force below:

F= ma + mg

I got this equation from my lecturer. He asked the class to determine how was the formula above formulated. But this is not a homework. Is the equation above true for g-force? If it's true, how does the formula come about?

I thought g-force is given by (as stated by Newton's law of universal gravitation):

F = G m1m2/r^2

I really can't see how these two equations are equal. Could you help me out? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now that I have had a good look at my question, I thought about the following:

F = ma + mg
F - mg = ma
F - Fg = ma
→ ƩFnet = F - Fg = ma

Actually I will be on a trip to ride a roller coaster. Our class was asked to determine first how was the 'formula for g-force' F = ma + mg formulated.

If an object falls freely downward, it would be subjected to g (acceleration due to gravity). Time this with the object' mass we would obtain its weight/ gravitational force, Fg. However Newton's 3rd law states that for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction, hence this opposite force, denoted as F, which is directed upward (opposite Fg), but has an equal magnitude to that of Fg. The net force, ƩFnet, is then the difference between these two forces (F and Fg) and it must obey Newton's 2nd law, which is
ƩFnet = ma​

Therefore, the F in the equation F = ma + mg (given by my lecturer) is not really a g-force, is it? Because g-force is already given by Fg = mg. In other words, F = ma + mg is not an equation to find the gravitational force, right?

Am I right? If not, please correct me.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Well, mg is the force due to gravity alone - which we call 'weight'.

Is weight a g-force, or do we consider the other 'peculiar' forces (a) experienced on a ride the 'g-force' and leave weight out of it? Or is it all g-force?

It's just semantics, but generally we'd consider weight part of the g-force so it's g+a.
So F = m(g+a)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top