What is the Relationship Between x and n in x^n > (x+1)^n-1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between x and n in the inequality x^n > (x+1)^(n-1). It is established that the function x^x is defined for x > 0, and the inequality holds true for x ≥ 2 and n as a natural number, but not universally for all x in that range. A counterexample is provided, showing that x^4 > (x+1)^3 only for x greater than approximately 2.7. The dependence of the inequality on n is highlighted, indicating that the threshold value of x increases with larger n. The discussion concludes with an approximation that reveals the behavior of the ratio as x approaches infinity.
mprm86
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
1. For what "x"s are defined the function x^x (x is a real number).
2. Demonstrate that x^n > (x+1)^n-1


By the way, which tool do you use for including equations in the posts?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First of all, to use equations you use LaTex, there are posts on it in most forums. Also, your second equation should have a "greater OR equal" sign, since for n = 1 and x = 1 you have 1 = 1
 
Last edited:
Yea, i forgot to said yesterday that i want the proof for x>=2, x is natural.
 
mprm86 said:
1. For what "x"s are defined the function x^x (x is a real number).
2. Demonstrate that x^n > (x+1)^n-1


By the way, which tool do you use for including equations in the posts?

2^2 >= 3^2-1
4 >= 8
false
 
In general, ax is only defined (as a real-valued function of real numbers) for a> 0 so the domain of xx is x> 0. If you are dealing with complex functions of complex numbers, I believe it is defined for all x not equal to 0.

Alkatran: Good point, but I suspect he really meant:

Prove that xn > (x+1)n-1 for x>= 2, n a natural number.

Even then it is not true. x4> (x+1)3 only for x> approximately 2.7. In particular, 2.54= 39 1/16 while 3.53= 42 7/8.

Eventually xn> (x+1)n-1 but the value of x for which that is true increases with n.
 
To get a "feel" of the dependence on "n", consider the ratio:
\frac{(x+1)^{n-1}}{x^{n}}=\frac{(1+\frac{1}{x})^{n}}{(x+1)}}=\frac{((1+\frac{1}{x})^{x})^{\frac{n}{x}}}{(x+1)}
For big x, we have:
(1+\frac{1}{x})^{x}\approx{e}
That is, for big x, our expression is approximately:
\frac{e^{\frac{n}{x}}}{(x+1)}
Since the numerator goes to 1 as x\to\infty we see that the fraction goes to zero as x\to\infty
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top