What is the Role of Cosmology in Understanding Spacetime and Parallel Universes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alice87368
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of cosmology in understanding concepts such as the warping of spacetime and parallel universes. Participants explore the academic path towards becoming a theoretical physicist in this field, including the mathematical requirements and the nature of research in cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to work on the warping of spacetime and parallel universes, seeking clarification on the field of cosmology and its mathematical demands.
  • Another participant notes that theoretical cosmology involves a high level of mathematics, particularly in areas like quantum theories of gravity and general relativity.
  • It is suggested that mastering differential geometry is essential for understanding the warping of spacetime, while the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics may require less math but still involves significant complexity.
  • Participants discuss the importance of self-study and preparation for research, highlighting the differences between classroom learning and independent research efforts.
  • One participant reflects on their own learning experiences, noting that not all self-study methods have been effective for them.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a strong mathematical foundation is necessary for theoretical work in cosmology, but there are varying opinions on the specific requirements and the nature of research preparation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to learning and the effectiveness of different study methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the exact mathematical requirements for different aspects of cosmology and the varying levels of complexity associated with parallel universe theories. There is also a lack of consensus on the effectiveness of self-study compared to formal education.

alice87368
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
help please. what field is this?

okay, so i want to be a physicist. but I am not sure what kind of physicist this is: i want to work on the warping of spacetime, and parallel universes, and stuff like that. i talked to my proffesor and he said that is cosmology, but would that require TONS of math? i just don't know what to do. i love the universe. but i don't want to be an astronomer, i want to work on the physics of it all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Physics publication also requires proper english.
 


what is wrong with my english? and if there is something wrong with it I am pretty sure you can figure out what i mean
 


I did not realize that was your first post on PF. So welcome to PF. Yes I can figure out what you mean, but please remember our guidelines
In the interest of conveying ideas as clearly as possible, posts are required to show reasonable attention to written English communication standards. This includes the use of proper grammatical structure, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling. SMS messaging shorthand, such as using "u" for "you", is not acceptable.

Do I get it right that you want to be a theoretician, not an experimentalist ?

If you want to be a theoretical cosmologist, yes, the math level in cosmological string-inspired models is fairly high. There are not many professionals in this field actually, and getting a position will require a genuine contribution, new ideas. From my point of view, it is desirable that you have enough time to study in advance on your own things which are not taught in your regular courses yet. That should give you a taste of or glimpse at what research is. However, it is imperative that you are already quite comfortable with the current material in your courses.

Gerard 't Hooft has a dedicated webpage full of good advices.
 


Okay, so you are saying that I should do work on things that are above the level I am on, but first, I should be comfortable with the material that I am learning now? Only I donnt really understand what you meant when you said that will give me a glimpse or taste on what research is.
 


When you do research, first you read what has been by others in the field. You study their solutions. That is very similar to studying textbooks on your own, except the material is usually not as well written. So by studying on your own, you get a good preparation for research : you realize how different it is from regular classes. It takes a lot of effort, but anything I studied in this manner, I never forgot.
 


alice87368 said:
okay, so i want to be a physicist. but I am not sure what kind of physicist this is: i want to work on the warping of spacetime, and parallel universes, and stuff like that. i talked to my proffesor and he said that is cosmology, but would that require TONS of math? i just don't know what to do. i love the universe. but i don't want to be an astronomer, i want to work on the physics of it all.
Those subjects do require "tons" of math. Almost everything in theoretical physics does. The most math-heavy fields are the quantum theories of gravity, and mathematically rigorous quantum field theory.

"Warping of spacetime" would be general relativity, or some quantum theory of gravity. The former is a pretty math-heavy subject that requires that you have mastered differential geometry, and the latter is much, much more math-heavy than that.

"Parallel universes"...there's more than one kind. The many-worlds interpretation of QM is the kind that requires the least math, and I also think most of the work that's been done about it is garbage, and that there's still stuff worth doing in that area. But "interpretations" aren't considered a priority by many physicists, and it's possible that you'd need a lot of math (possible including some heavy functional analysis, which is even worse than differential geometry) to be able to come up with something interesting to say about a many-worlds interpretation.

There's also a kind of "parallel" universe that can be a part of some cosmological models. Some of them require a lot of math, and some don't. But they all require that you know some differential geometry at least.
 


humanino said:
So by studying on your own, you get a good preparation for research : you realize how different it is from regular classes. It takes a lot of effort, but anything I studied in this manner, I never forgot.
It would have been so awesome if it worked that way for me. I learned almost everything I know the hard way, but only a few things really stuck in my memory because of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K