What is the Role of Gravitons in the Spin and Mass of Charged Particles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitation, mass, and the spin of charged particles like electrons and protons. It posits that gravitons can influence the angular speed of charged spheres and potentially increase their mass. The argument suggests that the electron's lower mass is due to its slower spin compared to the proton, which spins significantly faster. The conversation critiques the idea that massless particles like gravitons and photons lack spinning charges, noting that neutrons, which are uncharged, still possess mass. It raises questions about the formation of massless particles from quarks and introduces the concept of spinning one-dimensional space as a fundamental aspect of gravity. The discussion concludes by emphasizing the importance of energy square values in understanding mass ratios between particles, aligning closely with experimental data.
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Gravitons increase the speed at which a charge sphere spins and increase its mass.
So an electron has a smaller mass than a proton because its spins more slowly.
Because the proton has 1835 x mass of electron and because the electron spins at 10 ^ 14 metres per second - to give the observed magnetic moment- this means,bearing in mind (1 – v^2 / vfast^2)^ 1/2 , that the proton spins at 10 ^ 17 metres per second – at least !
The spin of a charge sphere is quantised.
Gravitons and photons are massless because they don’t have spinning charges.
It is my belief that they consist of non-spinning quarks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...wow. OK, let's begin at the top. Gravitons increase the angular speed of a charged sphere? I'm not sure where this one comes from. Gravitons increase mass? A very odd way of looking at it, but, I suppose, acceptable. Mass is that quality of a body which is it's resistance to acceleration. Gravitons are the carriers of the gravitational force. In the presence of more gravitons, it is plausible that mass might be considered to increase, although I doubt it; we'll have to wait for a theory of quantum gravity to find out for sure. Electrons have less mass because they spin less quickly? Where did this idea come from in the first place?

By vfast I assume you mean c, given the placement in the equation.

How you can say gravtions and photons are massless due to the lack of spinning charge is beyond me. Nuetrons have no charge, and yet have mass. Even more baffling is the statement that gravitons and photons are made of non-spinning quarks. How, exactly, could particles like quarks with mass combine into a massless particle?
 
What actually creates the force of gravity is not spinning charge but spinning one dimensional space (accelerated - constant change of direction but the magnitude stays the same). There must be two spin axes (path of one is the axis of the other) in order for total spin configuration to be conserved. The invariant quantity is the square of energy, a true quantum. There are two kinds of square of energy. Their matrix addition gives values for electric charge and their matrix multiplication gives values for mass. The incorporation of these ideas gives close agreement for the mass ratio of proton and electron within 1 percent of experimental error.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top