What is the role of velocity in the equation F = qv x B?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of velocity in the equation F = qv x B, particularly in the context of charged particles moving through magnetic fields. Participants explore different interpretations of velocity, including drift velocity and net velocity, and how these relate to the force experienced by the charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the velocity in the equation refers to drift velocity or another form of velocity, such as the net velocity of the charge.
  • One participant states that a particle experiences force only if its velocity is perpendicular to the magnetic field, referencing the relationship between force, charge, and magnetic field direction.
  • Another participant clarifies that the velocity used in calculations should be the actual velocity of the particle, not drift velocity, and distinguishes between these two concepts.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of using different inertial reference frames, noting that the magnetic force can vary depending on the frame of reference, particularly at relativistic speeds.
  • A participant suggests that in the case of a wire, the velocity can be interpreted as drift velocity, with the charge representing current rather than individual particle charge.
  • There is mention of the equation F = iL x B, which describes the force on a current-carrying wire, indicating a possible alternative perspective on the relationship between current, drift velocity, and magnetic force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of velocity in the context of the equation, with no consensus reached on whether drift velocity or net velocity should be used. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of using different velocities in various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of specifying the reference frame when discussing velocity, as this can affect the calculated magnetic force. There are also indications that the definitions of drift velocity and net velocity may depend on the specific physical context being considered.

Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
I was just wondering, since my textbook doesn't really explain it too well, what velocity is part of the equation F = qv x B? Is it the drift velocity, or...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A particle of charge q that moving with velocity v through a space where there exists a magnetic field B will experience force F.
 
Ok assume there is an electron in a magnetic field, will the force be affected by said electrons drift velocity, or would it be something else?
 
There is only a force if the velocity of a particle is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field. For a positive charge, hold out your hand and put your thumb in the direction of positive current, then put your straightened fingers in the direction of the magnetic field, and your palm will face the direction of force.
 
No I know how to calculate the force, all I want to know is if we put an electron into a magnetic field, so that the electron is moving perpendicular to the field, would the velocity we use be the drift speed of that electron?
 
The velocity used in the calculation of Force of magnetic field is not drift velocity but velocity of the particle. Drift velocity is different from the velocity. Drift is called by the combination of magnetic force and other kind of force, and drift velocity is departed from velocity. You can refer to the definition of drift in magnetic field.
 
Snazzy said:
There is only a force if the velocity of a particle is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field.

No. The magntude of the magnetic force is qvB \sin \theta, where \theta is the angle between the velocity of the particle and the direction of the magnetic field. The field is zero only when the velocity is along the direction of the field. The force is maximum when the velocity and the field are perpendicular.
 
Whoops, should've said when a component of the velocity is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field.
 
Feldoh said:
I was just wondering, since my textbook doesn't really explain it too well, what velocity is part of the equation F = qv x B? Is it the drift velocity, or...?
Practicly you would use v relative to the charge that causes B, because you can easily calculate B in that system.
In general you can use any inertial coordinate system and measure the speed of the charge q in that system. You might get different magnetic force F in diferent systems, but this is not a problem, since B and E are also dependent on the system and particle feels both electric and magnetic force. For systems moving relative to each other at nonrelativistic speeds you will get aproximately the same electromagnetic force F. If speeds are relativistic, you get different F in different systems since a relativistic particle has different acceleration in different inertial systems (but those different forces will still describe the same movement).
 
  • #10
Hello dear,

Let me help ypu..

the velocity is the net velocity of CHARGE ,

Lets take some cases here...

1.charge is moving independently with velocity V, so This V will be used in our equation

2.A charge is moving inside a metal with velocity(drift velocity) V1 (e.g free electrons in semi-conductors) and metal is moving with velocity V2,

this means-NET velocity is the VECTOR SUM of V1(drift velocity) n V2(metal velocity) ,

this situation is justified in "ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION" where we use velocity of moving metal(metal velocity) to find magnetic force on CHARGE
 
  • #11
Sorry, but we don't use relative velocity

Lojzek said:
Practicly you would use v relative to the charge that causes B, because you can easily calculate B in that system.
In general you can use any inertial coordinate system and measure the speed of the charge q in that system. You might get different magnetic force F in diferent systems, but this is not a problem, since B and E are also dependent on the system and particle feels both electric and magnetic force. For systems moving relative to each other at nonrelativistic speeds you will get aproximately the same electromagnetic force F. If speeds are relativistic, you get different F in different systems since a relativistic particle has different acceleration in different inertial systems (but those different forces will still describe the same movement).
Sorry, but we don't use relative velocity as you said in this post,we only use net ACTUAL velocity of charge
 
  • #12
mr.survive said:
Sorry, but we don't use relative velocity as you said in this post,we only use net ACTUAL velocity of charge
You did not read my post carefully. I used the phrase "relative velocity" because it may not be clear which system of coordinates we should choose. In this case "actual velocity" has little meaning.
 
  • #13
Feldoh said:
I was just wondering, since my textbook doesn't really explain it too well, what velocity is part of the equation F = qv x B? Is it the drift velocity, or...?

Please correct me if I'm wrong. For a wire, v serves as the drift velocity in equation F = qv x B, even if it isn't an actual velocity. With this assignment, q must be interpreted as the amount of current entering the wire, per unit time.

Importantly, with these assignments, q is not the charge carried by each particle.

I realize that this isn't the usual correspondence of variables, but it seems to serve.

Maybe you were really looking for this equation: F = iL x B, the force on a current carrying wire of length, L within B.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Phrak said:
Please correct me if I'm wrong. For a wire, v serves as the drift velocity in equation F = qv x B, even if it isn't an actual velocity. With this assignment, q must be interpreted as the amount of current entering the wire, per unit time.

Importantly, with these assignments, q is not the charge carried by each particle.

I realize that this isn't the usual correspondence of variables, but it seems to serve.

Maybe you were really looking for this equation: F = iL x B, the force on a current carrying wire of length, L within B.

Ah thanks, I get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K