What is the significance of the 1/3 factor in the derivation of PV=nRT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Pv=nrt
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the 1/3 factor in the derivation of the ideal gas law, PV=nRT. Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual reasoning behind this factor, particularly in relation to the average velocity components of gas particles in three dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the origin of the 1/3 factor, suggesting it relates to pressure being averaged over three dimensions.
  • Others explain that the 1/3 factor arises from averaging the squared velocity components of gas particles, noting that for an isotropic gas, the averages of the x, y, and z components are equal.
  • A participant points out that the definition of the variable k in the equations is arbitrary, which necessitates the inclusion of the 1/3 factor in intermediate steps.
  • There is a discussion about the symmetry of isotropic gases, with some participants asserting that there is no reason for one coordinate direction to differ from another, leading to equal averages.
  • Several participants seek clarification on why the averages of the velocity components are equal for isotropic gases, with responses emphasizing the nature of isotropy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the 1/3 factor, with some agreeing on its derivation from averaging velocity components, while others remain uncertain about the implications of isotropy and symmetry in this context. The discussion does not reach a consensus on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about isotropy and the arbitrary nature of certain definitions, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved within the conversation.

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
http://quantumfreak.com/derivation-of-pvnrt-the-equation-of-ideal-gas/



here is the link.


so we assume the particle hits two surfaces of the cube, thus pressure is 1/3.




combine the equation #11 and #12 we solve kinetic energy equation #12 for mv2.

13. mv^2=2E_{kinetic}\Rightarrow\frac{mv^2}{3}=\frac{2E_{kinetic}}{3}



My question is, I don't understand where 1/3 comes from. is this because the pressure is 1/3?


Thanks for all your help:)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well at that point it is just the same equation written in a more complicated way (both sides get divided by 3). The definition of k is arbitrary here, it is chosen in such a way that the final equation does not have a numerical prefactor, and this requires the 1/3 in the intermediate steps.
 
Equation 8
N is the particles moving only in the x-direction.
It should have been written as Nx, to avoid confusion
and we take the velocity only in the x-direction Vx
We also have Ny = Nz = Nx
Similarily Vy = Vz = Vx


Equation 11
N is all the particles
( = Nx + Ny + Nz, see the previous logic in the statement before equation 7 )
The velocity is that of the particle along its path, and not parallel to any particular coordinate axis.
Here though, it is the velocity of the particle that is split into components Vx=Vy=Vz, rather than thinking about the number of particles that are moving in the x, y or z directions.
 
kidsasd987 said:
http://quantumfreak.com/derivation-of-pvnrt-the-equation-of-ideal-gas/

My question is, I don't understand where 1/3 comes from. is this because the pressure is 1/3?
Thanks for all your help:)

The 1/3 comes from expressing the average of the x component (squared) in terms of the total velocity squared.
You have
v^2=v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2
When we take the average
<v^2>=<v_x^2>+<v_y^2>+<v_z^2>
(I use brackets for "average")
For an isotropic gas, the average is the same for each component (the three terms on the right are equal). So any of the averages on the right hand side is 1/3 of the average of v^2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
nasu said:
The 1/3 comes from expressing the average of the x component (squared) in terms of the total velocity squared.
You have
v^2=v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2
When we take the average
<v^2>=<v_x^2>+<v_y^2>+<v_z^2>
(I use brackets for "average")
For an isotropic gas, the average is the same for each component (the three terms on the right are equal). So any of the averages on the right hand side is 1/3 of the average of v^2.

Can u give a good explanation why for an isotropic gas those 3 averages are equal?
 
Symmetry. There is no reason why one coordinate should look different from the others (and the definition of those coordinates is arbitrary anyway).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Delta² said:
Can u give a good explanation why for an isotropic gas those 3 averages are equal?

Because it is isotropic?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Delta² said:
Can u give a good explanation why for an isotropic gas those 3 averages are equal?

That's what isotropic mean. Any quantity measured along any direction - say the x-axis, will give the same result as any other direction - say the y-axis or the z-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K