Ideal Gas Equation: Deriving pV=Nm<c>^2/3

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Ideal gas
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 3K views
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
I need a detailed derivation of why pV = [itex]\frac{Nm<c>^{2}}{3}[/itex]for an ideal gas using the example of a gas molecule placed in a cube-shaped container, the derivation in my book isn't that clear.[itex]^{}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Or if that doesn't help, maybe you could tell us about the derivation in your book (or better yet, give us a link to it if you find it somewhere online) and describe to us what you find unclear about it. Then maybe someone can get you un-stuck.
 
Try:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_theory

The shape of the container is irrelevant, but I think you need more than one molecule.
 
Last edited:
klimatos said:
Try:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_theory

The shape of the container is irrelevant, but I think you need more than one molecule.


So, is the equation valid for any container of any shape?
 
Yes. It is easier to derive for a simple container, but turns out it works for every container.

Note that you can always select an imaginary cube INSIDE gas, and assume - as everything around is identical to the gas inside the selected volume - that for every molecule leaving the imaginary cube, one identical molecule enters the cube. This is equivalent to the molecules bouncing on the cube walls, which is part of assumptions required when deriving the equation. And as every dV inside of the volume of gas behaves the same way, equation holds also for whole V.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
So, is the equation valid for any container of any shape?

Yes, although your original post uses V which I assume is the volume of one mole at the specified pressuire and N which I assume is Avogadro's number. To apply to any size container, that specification has to be changed.

Since N/V = n, where n is the number density of molecules per unit volume, the equation becomes
P = nm<c>2/3. This would apply to any shape and size of macroscopic container.

It would help a lot if you would define the terms used in the OP. Not all authors use the same common terms in the same way. For instance, the term c is often used to designate the speed of light in a vacuum, and p is often used to designate momentum.
 
klimatos said:
Yes, although your original post uses V which I assume is the volume of one mole at the specified pressuire and N which I assume is Avogadro's number. To apply to any size container, that specification has to be changed.

Since N/V = n, where n is the number density of molecules per unit volume, the equation becomes
P = nm<c>2/3. This would apply to any shape and size of macroscopic container.

It would help a lot if you would define the terms used in the OP. Not all authors use the same common terms in the same way. For instance, the term c is often used to designate the speed of light in a vacuum, and p is often used to designate momentum.

Actually N is the number of molecules, N_A is avogadro's constant, p is pressure, n is the amount in moles, and V is the total volume of the container.