What is the Simple Quantity That Determines Standing Wave Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between tension, frequency, and standing wave energy in a string with four antinodes. It highlights that the ratio T/(mu*f^2) remains constant across different configurations with the same number of nodes. Participants suggest that the simplified quantity related to this ratio could be either lambda squared or A squared, based on dimensional analysis. The wave speed equation is also referenced to further understand the relationship between tension and wave properties. The conversation concludes with a request for clarification on the correct answer to the posed question.
~angel~
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
The expression T(tension)/(mu*f^2) shows that no matter what the tension, and frequency are, as long as there are the same amount of nodes in the string, the ratio is always the same.

The reason that the ratio in the previous part always comes out the same, regardless of which of the many possible configurations of the string that give four antinodes you chose, is that the ratio actually equals a much simpler quantity that will always be the same for configurations of the string that yield four antinodes. Which of the following gives that quantity? Here E is the energy of the wave, and A is the amplitude.

a.lambda b.lambda^2 c.E d.E^2 e.A f.A^2

I'm not sure what the answer is. Would someone please help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just by looking at the equation you can tell that it is going to have dimensions of length squared. So the answer is either lambda^2 or A^2. The wave speed in a rope is given by c = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} which is also equal to c=\nu\lambda. Equating these expressions, you may then write down what \frac{T}{\mu\nu^2} is equal to.
 
Oh ok. Thanks for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top