What is the smallest natural number n for a^(3n)=a (mod 85)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter papacy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
AI Thread Summary
To find the smallest natural number n such that a^(3n) = a (mod 85) for any integer a, the problem can be broken down using the Chinese Remainder Theorem. Since 85 factors into 17 and 5, it is necessary to solve a^(3n) = a (mod 5) and a^(3n) = a (mod 17). By applying Fermat's Little Theorem, it is established that a^5 ≡ a (mod 5) and a^17 ≡ a (mod 17). The smallest n that satisfies both conditions is found to be n = 11, as 3n must equal 33, which is the least common multiple of the necessary exponents. Thus, the solution concludes that n = 11 is correct.
papacy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the smallest natural number n such that: a^(3n)=a (mod 85) for each integer a.
Justify your answer.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



because 85=17 . 5 and gcd (5,17)=1 we have to find the n such:

a^(3n)=a (mod 5) and a^(3n)=a (mod 17).

From Fermat theorem we know that a^(17)=a (mod 17) and a^(5)=a (mod 5)

so we have: a^(5)=a^(3n) (mod 5) and a^(17)=a^(3n)(mod 17).

I don't now how to continue and find the smallest natural n.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've already observed that it suffices to find a minimal n such that a^{3n} \equiv a \pmod{5} and a^{3n} \equiv a \pmod{17}. Here's a hint about how to do so:

You already know that a^{5} \equiv a \pmod{5}. Show that a^9 \equiv a \pmod{5}, a^{13} \equiv a \pmod{5} and so on.

Similarly, you know that a^{17} \equiv a \pmod{17}. Show that a^{33} \equiv a \pmod{17}, and so on.

Use the above to find the least exponent 3n such that a^{3n} \equiv a \pmod{5} and a^{3n} \equiv a \pmod{17}.

Please post again if you have any questions.
 
i just do it. i find a^(33)=a(mod5) and a^(33)=a(mod17)
now can i say that 3n=33 and n=11. is that right ?
 
papacy said:
i just do it. i find a^(33)=a(mod5) and a^(33)=a(mod17)
now can i say that 3n=33 and n=11. is that right ?

I got the same answer.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top