What is the solution for 12^x = 18?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 12^x = 18, one approach is to use logarithms, resulting in x = log(18)/log(12). Another method involves rewriting 12 and 18 in terms of their prime factors, leading to the equations 2 * 3^2 = 3^x * 2^{2x}. However, this method reveals a contradiction, indicating that the assumption of integer exponents is flawed. The discussion highlights that the original equation does not have an integer solution for x. Ultimately, the correct interpretation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the properties of exponents in prime factorization.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi everyone. Here's a simple problem I need help with:


Find x such that 12^x = 18

From one point of view, x = log(18)/log(12) and the problem is solved.

However, if we write 12 as 3*2^2 and 18 as 3^2*2 then,

(2 * 3^2) = 3^x * 2^{2x}

and hence by the uniqueness of prime factorization (in particular that of the exponents of the prime factors),

x = 2
and 2x = 1

but these equations do not have a consistent solution. I think the error is in the second reasoning.


Can someone help please?

Cheers
Vivek
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can only guarantee unique factorization if you have integral exponents. When you try to invoke the fundamental theorem of arithmetic you would also need the assumption that the exponents x and 2x are integers. Your contradiction only tells you that there is no integer x that satisfies the original equation.
 
Thanks Shmoe.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top