What is the solution for Ry in Sin 0=Ry/Rx when given values for Rx and theta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niknak98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation Sin(0) = Ry/Rx, where confusion arises regarding whether "0" should actually be "theta." It is clarified that if Sin(0) is indeed used, then Ry must be zero, and Rx can be any non-zero real number. The correct interpretation is likely Sin(theta) = Ry/Rx, which allows for proper solutions for Ry, Rx, and theta through algebraic manipulation and inverse functions. The participants emphasize the importance of accurately representing theta in the equation. Ultimately, the teacher confirmed the correction, validating the interpretation of the variable.
niknak98
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Teacher assigned this on first day due tomorrow and i have no clue on some like this one:

Sin 0=Ry/Rx a.) solve for Ry
b.) solve for Rx
c.) solve for 0

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there anymore information you can provide? Is that actually Sin(0)? Did you attempt to solve it on your own? Have you tried the inverse function?

Anyway, if it really is 0 then it should be obvious. Ry would have to be zero. Rx is then any real which is not equal to zero. Rewriting the equation as arcsin(Ry/Rx) = 0 will demonstrate this as well. I'm saying this because part of me doesn't believe that is really supposed to be sin(0), instead it's probably theta.
 
Last edited:
I can make absolutely no sense out of "solve for 0"! That would be like saying "solve for 2".

I strongly suspect that was supposed to be sin(\theta)= R_y/R_x and your teacher (or you!) missed the horizontal line on the \theta.

To "solve for y", multiply both sides by R_x. To "solve for x" one method is to first invert both sides, getting 1/sin(\theta)= R_x/R_y and then multiply both sides by R_y. To "solve for \theta" take the inverse sin (arcos or sin^{-1}) of both sides.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I can make absolutely no sense out of "solve for 0"! That would be like saying "solve for 2".

I strongly suspect that was supposed to be sin(\theta)= R_y/R_x and your teacher (or you!) missed the horizontal line on the \theta.

To "solve for y", multiply both sides by R_x. To "solve for x" one method is to first invert both sides, getting 1/sin(\theta)= R_x/R_y and then multiply both sides by R_y. To "solve for \theta" take the inverse sin (arcos or sin^{-1}) of both sides.

Thanks this really helped and he did correct it that the 0 was theta
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top