What is the solution for the attached equation?

AI Thread Summary
The equation I(z) = cosh(1/2 ∫I(z)dz) is considered solvable through various approaches. Deriving both sides with respect to z leads to an ordinary differential equation, though it complicates the solution. Introducing J(z) as sinh(1/2 ∫I(z)dz) results in a two-dimensional system that can be solved numerically with specific initial conditions. Alternatively, a power series can be constructed iteratively using recurrence relations for I and J. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of the equation and potential methods for finding solutions.
eahaidar
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Good afternoon,
i was just wondering if this equation is possibly solvable where I(z) is a function of z. The equation is:
I(z)=cosh(1/2 ∫I(z)dz)
I know it looks stupid but is it possible? How would you approach this problem?
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • eq.png
    eq.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 466
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try to derive both side with respect to z. This will give you an ordinary differential equation. Then try to solve it in another way.
 
Thanks for the response. However I get hyperbolic sinh which just makes it much worse. :(
 
Maybe first set $$arcosh(I(z))=\frac {1}{2} \int_z^L I(x)dx $$ and then take the derivate?
 
eahaidar said:
Thanks for the response. However I get hyperbolic sinh which just makes it much worse. :(

If you introduce J(z) = \sinh\left(\frac12 \int I(z)\,dz\right) then you can get the two-dimensional system <br /> I&#039; = \frac12 IJ \\<br /> J&#039; = \frac12 I^2<br /> which can be solved numerically subject to given initial conditions (which, like cosh and sinh, must satisfy I(0)^2 - J(0)^2 = 1). Alternatively, you can construct power series iteratively by starting with I_0(z) = I(0), J_0(z) = J(0) and using the recurrence relation <br /> I_{n+1}(z) = I(0) + \frac12 \int_0^z I_n(t)J_n(t)\,dt, \\<br /> J_{n+1}(z) = J(0) + \frac12 \int_0^z I_n^2(t)\,dt.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top