What is the Solution to a Heat Conduction Problem in a Rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The heat conduction problem defined by the equation 100Uxx=Ut, with boundary conditions U(0,t)=0 and U(1,t)=0, and initial condition U(x,0)=sin(2πx)-sin(5πx), can be solved using Fourier series. The coefficients Cn are determined by evaluating the integral cn=2∫(sin(2πx)-sin(5πx))sin(nπx)dx from 0 to 1. The exponential term in the solution is e^{-100n^2π^2t}, which indicates the decay of the heat over time. The correct approach does not require tedious integration, as the coefficients can be directly inferred from the initial condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with Fourier series and their applications
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems in heat conduction
  • Proficiency in integral calculus, specifically trigonometric integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fourier series coefficients for different functions
  • Learn about the heat equation and its solutions in various boundary conditions
  • Explore numerical methods for solving PDEs, such as finite difference methods
  • Investigate the role of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in solving boundary value problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in applied mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those focused on heat transfer and differential equations.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the solution of the heat conduction problem:

100Uxx=Ut, 0<x<1, t>0;

U(0,t)=0, U(1,t)=0, t>0;

U(x,0)=sin(2\pix)-sin(5\pix), 0\leqx\leq1

Homework Equations



U(x,t)=\sumcne(-n2\pi2\alpha2t)/L2sin((n\pix)/L)

(sum from n=1 to infinity)


cn=2/L \intf(x)sin((n\pix)/L)dx (evalutated from 0 to L)

The Attempt at a Solution




cn=2\int(sin(2\pix)-sin(5\pix))sin(n\pix)dx=0 (evalutated from 0 to 1)

I did this tedious integral by hand and got zero and verified it with my calculator. Therefore, I think that I am setting up the problem wrong. So if this is not how to set up cn then what should I do different?


Thank you for your time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
None of those pi's should be superscripts. Not sure why they came out like that.
 
Strictly speaking they didn't. LaTeX is typically put slightly out of line with the text. I recommend that you NOT put indvidual symbols in LaTeX but entire formulas. Using "[ itex ]... [ /itex ]" (without the spaces, of course) will keep short formulas better in line with text. [ tex ]... [ /tex ] will look better on separate lines from text.

Where did that "\alpha" come from? There is no \alpha in your problem. I get
e^{-100n^2\pi^2 t}
for the exponential.

You don't really need to do any integral.

I get
\sum C_n e^{-100n^2\pi^2 t}sin(n\pi x)
and at t= 0 that is
\sum C_n sin(n\pi x)= sin(2\pi x)- sin(5\pi x)
It should be obvious from that what each C_n must be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K