What is the Solution to the Polynomial Equation (x+1)P(x) = xP(x+1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter canopus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The polynomial equation (x+1)P(x) = xP(x+1) leads to the conclusion that P(x) must be identically zero. The discussion highlights that P(0) = 0 and establishes a recurrence relation for P(x) suggesting it has infinitely many zeros. The interpretation of "v" as "and" solidifies that the only polynomial satisfying both equations is a constant, which must be zero. Concerns about substituting x = 0 are noted, emphasizing the need for x to be non-zero when dividing by x. Ultimately, the consensus is that the solution to the polynomial equation is P(x) = 0.
canopus
[SOLVED] A polynome question

(x+1)*P(x)=x*P(x+1) v (x+1)*P(x)=x*P(x-1) ==> P(x)=?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think your polynome must be 0.

1: P(0) = 0
2: for x>-1 : P(x+1) = \frac{x}{x+1}P(x)

recurence : P is identically 0 on the natural integers.
I guess your polynome has finite order and infinitely many zeros
q.e.d. ?
 
Assuming that the "v" mean "and", since the left side of each equation is the same, you have P(x+1)= P(x-1). The only polynomial satisfying that is P(x)= a constant. In that case, the requirement that (x+1)P(x)= xP(x+1) becomes
(x+1)c= xc so c=0. The only polynomial satisfying (x+1)P(x)= xP(x+1) and
(x+1)P(x)= xP(x-1) is P(x)= 0.

"v" more commonly means "or". We could interpret that as meaning one equation is true for some values of x and the other for other values of x or as meaning that there are two questions for two different polynomials. I don't think there is enough information to solve either way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was concerned about the fact that the "v" should mean "or". But I could not make sens of the assumption with the "or". On the other hand, if it means "and", then there is too much information to solve the problem :confused:
 
Actually, i meant ''and''. I found P(0)=0 but when i put the ''0'' instead of ''x'', it seems impossible, because, let's write one of these polynomes, (x+1)*P(x)=x*P(x+1) we can write also like [(x+1)*P(x)]/x=P(x+1) then we put ''0'' instead of ''x'' but the result is found roughly infinite (that is through little). But, i might be wrong, what do you think?
 
canopus said:
Actually, i meant ''and''. I found P(0)=0 but when i put the ''0'' instead of ''x'', it seems impossible, because, let's write one of these polynomes, (x+1)*P(x)=x*P(x+1) we can write also like [(x+1)*P(x)]/x=P(x+1) then we put ''0'' instead of ''x'' but the result is found roughly infinite (that is through little). But, i might be wrong, what do you think?
When you divide through by x it is only valid for x \neq 0...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top