What is the solution to the Wedge-Spring-Block Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DSM_
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a wedge, spring, and block, focusing on the dynamics of the system and the role of gravitational and spring forces. Participants are exploring the implications of the spring's behavior on the overall mechanics of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effects of the spring on the system, with some questioning whether the spring's presence is significant. There are attempts to apply conservation of energy principles and to clarify the conditions under which the block is released. The relevance of the spring's initial state (taut or relaxed) is also debated.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the assumptions made about the spring's state. Some participants have suggested that energy conservation might lead to a specific answer, while others express uncertainty about the problem's wording and intent.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clarity in the problem statement regarding the initial conditions of the spring and the block, which may affect the interpretation of the solution. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions and interpretations that have not yet reached a consensus.

DSM_
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
rhr09k.png
I can't figure out how the answer is (A). The spring is the problem. I thought the spring would just extend and whole thing would act like a string.
If there were no spring then the answer come out to be (6/5)m. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you learned about gravitational potential energy and spring energy yet?
 
DSM_ said:
I thought the spring would just extend and whole thing would act like a string.
If there were no spring then the answer come out to be (6/5)m. Please help.
I agree, and since k does not appear in any of the answers, the questioner agrees the spring is irrelevant.
My guess is that the coefficient was supposed to be 1/4.
 
Even when the gravitational force exerted on the block M is equal to the spring force exerted on block M, the block is still moving. Your method presumes that this is not true. If you use conservation of energy to solve for the maximum spring force, answer (A) can be arrived at.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DSM_
AlephNumbers said:
Even when the gravitational force exerted on the block M is equal to the spring force exerted on block M, the block is still moving. Your method presumes that this is not true. If you use conservation of energy to solve for the maximum spring force, answer (A) can be arrived at.
You are assuming that block M is released with the spring just taut, i.e. at its relaxed length. Yes, that gives answer A, so that is probably what is intended, but I see nothing in the problem statement to justify that assumption.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DSM_
Okay, I have to do it with energy conservation.
If block is released when spring is relaxed, if it moves x downwards,
Work done by grav = Potential energy of Spring.
1/2kx^2 = Mgx
kx = 2Mg
Then tension is kx everywhere in string. Then equating to (friction + mgsin37) gives answer (A).

Is this correct?
 
DSM_ said:
Okay, I have to do it with energy conservation.
If block is released when spring is relaxed, if it moves x downwards,
Work done by grav = Potential energy of Spring.
1/2kx^2 = Mgx
kx = 2Mg
Then tension is kx everywhere in string. Then equating to (friction + mgsin37) gives answer (A).

Is this correct?
Seems so. Still a poorly worded question, and congratulations to AlephNumbers for guessing what was meant.
 
haruspex said:
Seems so. Still a poorly worded question, and congratulations to AlephNumbers for guessing what was meant.

I think questioner want us to assume that the spring is relaxed otherwise there wouldn't be any spring at all.

Yup, thanks AlephNumbers :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K