What is the solution to Zwiebach eqn (17.44) on page 395?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
22
[SOLVED] Zwiebach eqn (17.44) page 395

Homework Statement


Equation (17.44) is:
e^{-i\ell x_0/R}pe^{i\ell x_0/R} = p + \frac{\ell}{R}



Homework Equations


Equation (17.43)
\ell \in \mathbb{Z}



The Attempt at a Solution


Equation (17.44) is easy to derive if \frac{\ell}{R} is small. but since \ell can be any integer, there doesn't seem to be any way to insure that. Did the author simply forget to mention some conditions necessary for it to be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmysnyder said:

Homework Statement


Equation (17.44) is:
e^{-i\ell x_0/R}pe^{i\ell x_0/R} = p + \frac{\ell}{R}



Homework Equations


Equation (17.43)
\ell \in \mathbb{Z}



The Attempt at a Solution


Equation (17.44) is easy to derive if \frac{\ell}{R} is small. but since \ell can be any integer, there doesn't seem to be any way to insure that. Did the author simply forget to mention some conditions necessary for it to be true?

It's true to all orders. Just use [ x_0^n, p] = i n x_0^{n-1}.
 
nrqed said:
It's true to all orders. Just use [ x_0^n, p] = i n x_0^{n-1}.
Thanks for taking a look at this nrqed. If \frac{\ell}{R} were small, then I would expand the exponentials to linear terms. But it isn't small, so it would seem that I need to keep all terms. But if I consider up to quadratic terms I get:
p + \frac{\ell}{R} + \frac{\ell^2}{2!R^2}(x_0^2p + x_0px_0 - px_0^2) + \mathcal{O}({\frac{\ell^3}{R^3}})[/itex]<br /> Using your suggestion this becomes:<br /> p + \frac{\ell}{R} + \frac{\ell^2}{2!R^2}(2ix_0 + x_0px_0) + \mathcal{O}(\frac{\ell^3}{R^3})[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; This doesn&amp;#039;t seem to improve things. Is there a simpler approach that I am missing?
 
Last edited:
jimmysnyder said:
Thanks for taking a look at this nrqed. If \frac{\ell}{R} were small, then I would expand the exponentials to linear terms. But it isn't small, so it would seem that I need to keep all terms. But if I consider up to quadratic terms I get:
p + \frac{\ell}{R} + \frac{\ell^2}{2!R^2}(x_0^2p + x_0Px_0 - px_0^2) + \mathcal{O}({\frac{\ell^3}{R^3}})[/itex]<br /> Using your suggestion this becomes:<br /> p + \frac{\ell}{R} + \frac{\ell^2}{2!R^2}(2ix_0 + x_0Px_0) + \mathcal{O}(\frac{\ell^3}{R^3})[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; This doesn&amp;#039;t seem to improve things. Is there a simpler approach that I am missing?
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Hi Jimmy,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I am in a hurry because I am teaching a class in 15 minutes and have stuff to do. I will get back to you early this afternoon.
 
nrqed said:
I will get back to you early this afternoon.
Take your time. When you get back to it, you will find that I erroniously put upper case P's in my equations. They should be lower case. I fixed it in my post.

Edit - With your help, I have figured this out. Thanks nrqed.
 
Last edited:
jimmysnyder said:
Take your time. When you get back to it, you will find that I erroniously put upper case P's in my equations. They should be lower case. I fixed it in my post.

Edit - With your help, I have figured this out. Thanks nrqed.

I just got back from my classes. I am glad it worked out! As you see, it works to all orders.

Glad I could help!


Patrick
 
Just for the record, here is the solution:
e^{-ilx_0/R}pe^{ilx_0/R}

= (\Sigma\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^nx_0^np)e^{ilx_0/R}

Now using nrqed's suggestion:

= (\Sigma\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^npx_0^n + \Sigma_0\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^ninx_0^{n-1})e^{ilx_0/R}

= (p\Sigma\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^nx_0^n + \Sigma_1\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^ninx_0^{n-1})e^{ilx_0/R}

= (pe^{-ilx_0/R} + \frac{\ell}{R}\Sigma_1\frac{1}{(n-1)!}(\frac{-il}{R})^{n-1}x_0^{n-1})e^{ilx_0/R}

= (pe^{-ilx_0/R} + \frac{\ell}{R}\Sigma_0\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{-il}{R})^n}x_0^n)e^{ilx_0/R}

= (pe^{-ilx_0/R} + \frac{\ell}{R}e^{-ilx_0/R})e^{ilx_0/R}

= p + \frac{\ell}{R}
 
Last edited:
Back
Top