What is the speed of light in gravity?

Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
“It is a well proven fact, that the speed of light is reduced in a gravitational field. As a consequence, a light beam, which passes a big object, is bent towards the object.”

I read the above quote on the internet but I am not sure if it is a well proven fact that c is reduced in a gravitational field.

What is the accepted wisdom in physics on this issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what one means by "the speed of light".

All observers who measures the speed of a photon that whizzes by in their local (vacuum) neighbourhoods, near or far from large masses and even inside black holes, get the same result c.
 
Zman said:
“It is a well proven fact, that the speed of light is reduced in a gravitational field. As a consequence, a light beam, which passes a big object, is bent towards the object.”

I read the above quote on the internet but I am not sure if it is a well proven fact that c is reduced in a gravitational field.

Near a big mass the speed of light is reduced when measured by a distant clock. Measured locally it is still c due to gravitational time dialtion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

The same happens in accelerated frames of reference;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_light_in_non-inertial_reference_frames
 
George Jones said:
It depends on what one means by "the speed of light".

Is there an interpretation where the "speed of light" in a gravitational field can be said to vary.

All observers measure the speed of light to be c locally but can the speed of light be inferred as having altered at some remote gravitational potential?
 
Zman said:
Is there an interpretation where the "speed of light" in a gravitational field can be said to vary.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_light_in_non-inertial_reference_frames:
In non-inertial frames the local speed of light is also c, but the average speed of light measured over a finite distance may differ from c.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is there an interpretation where the "speed of light" in a gravitational field can be said to vary.
You can work in a weak-field approximation with a flat background, and treat gravitation as a perturbation. You then get g11/g00 (coordinate dx / coordinate dt) different from 1. Interpreting this as a different speed of light, you can calculate e.g. light deflection like you do in an optics problem. That's exactly what Einstein did in his original paper on GR.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
678
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top