What is the Stability of Nanoparticles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Billowz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
AI Thread Summary
Nanoparticles are small particles that exhibit unique properties due to their size and structure, which can influence their stability. The discussion highlights the challenge of finding accessible resources that explain the physics behind nanoparticle stability without delving too deeply into chemistry. Key concepts mentioned include multivalent bonding and colloidal stability, which are essential for understanding how nanoparticles maintain their structure. The importance of effective research skills is emphasized, suggesting that the assignment aims to develop these skills in a rapidly evolving field. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for clarity on the definitions and principles related to nanoparticle stability.
Billowz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a simple writing assignment where my professor has asked us to write a couple pages about:
- What a nano particle is, and the physics of how it's structure remains stable.

The first part I've got covered. It's the structure part that's throwing me off. This is a very basic physics course so nothing outrageous is required, but after many searches through my school library database and through google, every resource I find is either way too complicated for me to understand or off-topic.

Also, every source that I'm finding seems to be chemistry related so I'm not sure why he gave us this assignment. Anyway, if anyone could provide some simple resources - or maybe hint at what's he getting at with the structure that would be greatly appreciated.

So far in class he has covered (very lightly) some topics like quantum energy states of electrons and gave us this equation:
2. h x nu = E2-E1
and also talked a bit about how states can be super positioned? or something. I'm not sure that's even related though, so it's entirely possible he has never covered anything that I would need.
but we don't need any math for the course as that is not the focus. It is just about understanding concepts at a basic level.

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have found mentions of multivalent bonding causing nanoparticles to be more stable on wikipedia but that is all. Unfortunately, I cannot simply write about what I believe to be the answer without providing sources.

Thank you for any assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your proffesor is testing your googling skills and finding information. It is vitally important in such a fast growing field to develop this skill. It takes patience and repeated attempts and modifying your searches to get what you want. It would be wise to talk to a librarian to get an idea of how to conduct such searches. This site might be a good starting point http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/213.htm
 
  • Like
Likes Billowz
Thank you for your reply andrevdh. It does seem like he testing googling skills lol. Up until now I thought I was actually pretty decent at googling, but apparently not.

Could you comment on what he might mean by 'stability' of the nanoparticles? Everything I found so far points to that fact that nanoparticles very often are not stable, and when they are stable - it seems to be caused by a lot of things I don't understand, most of which seem more chemistry than physics.

For example; from a google search I find an article that discusses "formation and structure of self-assembled monolayer protected gold nanoparticles; colloid stability—DLVO and non-DLVO forces; photochemistry, photochromism and pyrimidine; and manipulation of colloid stability with external stimuli." Should I be looking at say, colloid stabillity then? I'm really not sure...
 
Your professor really throwed you into the deep end of the pool. This means that you can swim off into many different directions and he cannot blame you for choosing your own path. You are now entering a new field with a lot of strange teminology - like what is multivalent bonding or a colloid? Best to make yourself a dictionary that explains the relevant terms. You should be especially interested when physics enters the meaning of the terminology. Try and zoom in on the knowledge you want. You probably would need the - operator in your searches https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433?rd=1
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top