What is the Staircase Line in a Unit Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on creating a zig-zag staircase line within a unit square, illustrating that the total distance of the vertical and horizontal segments always sums to 2, regardless of how many segments are added. This phenomenon highlights a paradox where, despite the line visually approximating a diagonal, its length remains constant at 2, while the actual diagonal measures √2. The conversation touches on concepts like Minkowski's L1 distance and the Weyl Tile argument, linking them to broader implications in the philosophy of mathematics and geometric measure theory. Participants also reference external resources for further exploration of these mathematical principles. The discussion emphasizes the intriguing nature of geometric constructs and their implications in theoretical mathematics.
fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
Take the unit square & make a zig-zag line like a staircase from one corner to the opposite one. Then the total distance if you add up the vertical parts & & horizontal parts is 2. Even if you make trillions & trillions of 'stairs' the sum of all the vertical parts & horizontal parts is still 2 even though the graph would look more & more like a diagonal line, whose length of course is \sqrt{2}. Someone mentioned this example before & put up a link to the mathworld page on it but I couldn't find it & nothing I searched for seemed to work. :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hummm... fractals?
 
The diagonal paradox, again. Use the search button. :smile:
 
Minkowski's L1 distance

Taxicab metric?
 
Weyl Tile argument

fourier jr said:
Take the unit square & make a zig-zag line like a staircase from one corner to the opposite one. Then the total distance if you add up the vertical parts & & horizontal parts is 2. Even if you make trillions & trillions of 'stairs' the sum of all the vertical parts & horizontal parts is still 2 even though the graph would look more & more like a diagonal line, whose length of course is \sqrt{2}. Someone mentioned this example before & put up a link to the mathworld page on it but I couldn't find it & nothing I searched for seemed to work. :confused:

It's related to the "Weyl Tile argument", which is discussed in some books on philosophy of mathematics, and even some web pages:
http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/atomism.htm
The argument as stated there isn't serious, but this has serious applications to why naive "quantization" of space won't work. See spin networks for a more sophisticated approach: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/penrose/

It's also related to a "paradox" in geometric measure theory, which is probably closer to the applications you have in mind, huh? See p. 129 of Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top