B What is the use of simplifying a question in math?

AI Thread Summary
Simplifying mathematical expressions, such as trigonometric identities, enhances understanding and facilitates comparisons and further calculations. For instance, transforming Sin(x) * Cos(x) into Sin(2*x)/2 provides a clearer representation, especially when graphing. While both expressions yield the same results, the simplified form is often preferred for ease of use in future problems. The discussion emphasizes that simpler forms can prevent errors in calculations and improve visualization of graphs. Ultimately, simplifying expressions aids in achieving a more intuitive grasp of mathematical concepts.
pairofstrings
Messages
411
Reaction score
7
Hello. I have been looking into trigonometric identities that helps to simplify a question in mathematics. But the question that I have is, why do I need to simplify a question?

For instance:
Sin(x) * Cos(x) means Sin(2*x)/2.
I have no answer that tells me why I simplify Sin(x) * Cos(x) to its corresponding answer.

I have plotted graphs of Sin(x) * Cos(x) and Sin(2*x)/2 and both the expression give the same result.

I request you to write all the words associated with this question.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Double-angle formula

Simplifying the result makes it easier to understand it, it makes comparisons easier, and it is easier to use it in further steps if it is not the final answer.
The question "what is the nicest answer" is not always easy to answer. It is obvious that ##\displaystyle \left(\frac {3\sin(x)}{2} - \frac {\sin^2(x)}{2\sin(x)}\right) \left(\frac {4\cos^2(x)}{3\cos(x)} - \frac {\cos(x)}{3}\right)## is not a proper final answer, although it is identical to your expression, but sin(x) cos(x) versus sin(2x)/2? I would prefer sin(x) cos(x) over sin(2x)/2 in most cases, unless the double angle (2x) appears elsewhere as well.
 
  • Like
Likes pairofstrings and FactChecker
In my experience it is better to put it in the simplest form for ease of future solutions or graph plotting.

For example say you are asked to plot the long trig expression mfb posted within a certain range and you don't have a plotter. So you are to use excel or some similar spreadsheet program. And if you simplified the expression, it might be something like (it is not though) sin(9x)cos(3x).

In excel, I'd find it easier to plot sin(9x)cos(3x) than the long expression where I am likely to make a mistake and thus get the final solution wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes pairofstrings
Looking at the sin cos expression its hard to picture its graph but looking at sin 2x I know immediately that it will look like a sin x graph but with a doubled cycle in the domain of 0 to 2pi

Its the same reason for recasting a linear equation into y = mx + b form so that you can get the y intercept and the slope immediately and can draw the graph.
 
  • Like
Likes pairofstrings
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top