What is the velocity due to gravity between two point masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cromata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the velocity of a body of mass m as it moves toward another mass M under gravity, with the equation F=GMm/(R-x)^2 being central to the analysis. The derived speed at the moment of collision is found to be infinite, which raises questions about the validity of using point masses in this context. It is argued that this result is an artifact of the model, as it assumes point masses without considering their finite size. The infinite speed conclusion is further illustrated by comparing it to real-world scenarios, such as an asteroid falling toward Earth, where the Earth's radius cannot be neglected. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the limitations of the point mass approximation in gravitational interactions.
cromata

Homework Statement


-Two objects of negligable radius and masses M and m are fixed in space at the distance R. Gravity is the only force acting between those two bodies. At some point in time, body of mass m is realized and starts moving due to gravity toward statical mass M.
Find v(x) and speed of body m when it collides with M [x is the distance between the objects]

Homework Equations


F=GMm/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


GMm/(R-x)^2=m dv/dt
GM/(R-x)^2 =dv*v/dx
GM ∫dx/(R-x)^2=∫v*dv [integral of dx goes from 0 to x, and v from 0 to v]
GM*[1/(R-x)-1/R]=½(v^2)
v(x)=sqrt(2GM/R) * sqrt[x/(R-x)]
and for this function, we get that the speed at the moment of impact (x=R) is infinity
-Same result is obtained using energy conservation law, but it doesn't make sense to me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cromata said:
GMm/(R-x)^2=m dv/dt
If x is the distance between the two objects as you claim, is this expression consistent with Newton's Law of gravitation?
 
I made mistake, I found v(R-x)... but I'm not interrsted in that part of the problem (it's trivial). I just want to know why is v=infinity when two objects collide. Is it because in this sort of the problem we can't say that radius of objects is negligable?
-Because this result doesn't make any sense, for example if we have some object (some asteroid or smth) falling on Earth and we say that Earth's radius is negligable in comparison with the starting distance between Earth and that object, we would obtain that speed of that object is infinite when it hits Earth.
-Also if we have 2 small charges that attract each other (one is fixed, other is free to move) and distance between them is much larger than their radius. We would again obtain same result: infinite speed at the moment of collision.
 
The result that v = infinity when the two objects collide is an artifact of the model that assumes that there is such a thing as a point mass or point charge. Reason it out. You start with zero kinetic energy and finite potential energy. As the objects come closer, you convert potential energy to kinetic. Since the initial kinetic energy is zero, the instantaneous kinetic energy at point x is the absolute value of the change in potential energy. What happens to that change at x = 0 where the potential energy is infinite according to the model?
 
Gravitational potential energy at the beging of the motion is finite number (Egp1), and when they collide Egp2=-infinity
Ek(kintetic energy at the moment of colision)=|Egp1-Egp2|=infinity, hencr v=infinity. So the problem is in using point masses
 
cromata said:
So the problem is in using point masses
Yup.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top