What is the Velocity of the Larger Cube as the Smaller Cube Melts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the velocity of a larger cube as a smaller cube melts above it in a liquid. The larger cube has a mass of 8ρa^3, while the smaller cube has a mass of ρa^3, and their combined weight is balanced by the buoyant force. The melting of the smaller cube occurs uniformly, reducing its dimensions at a constant rate α. The key challenge is to find the rate of change of the smaller cube's mass over time and its impact on the larger cube's immersion depth. The problem suggests that the system remains nearly in equilibrium throughout the melting process.
geniusno.198
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two cubes made of the same material and edge length 'a' and '2a'. They are placed in a liquid of density σ such that the larger cube is completely submerged when the smaller cube is placed on top of it and the lower surface of smaller cube is just touching the surface of the liquid.
Now, if the smaller cube is heated sucjh that it melts uniformly and very slowly (reducing all dimensions simultaneously) such that the edge reduces at a constant rate α then the velocity of the larger cube as a function of time will be (assuming molten material evaporates immediately).

Homework Equations


let the densities of both the blocks be 'ρ'
Mass of the larger block= 8ρa^3 (mass=volume*density)
Mass of smaller block= ρa^3
since weight of both the blocks is balanced by the buoyant force the weight of both the blocks together is equal to the buoyant force.
(ρa^3+8ρa^3)g = Volume of body submerged*density of liquid*g
=8ρa^38σg
therefore ρ=8σ/9

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought what we basically have to find is the rate at which the mass of the small block is changing. so we we have to find the differential of the mass of the smaller block with respect to time. therefore d(8σa^3/9)/dt = 8σa^2/3 8 da/dt. but according to the question da/dt=α. I got stuck here,I don't know what I should do next.
 

Attachments

  • A.png
    A.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
I am really sorry, but could anyone please help me ?
 
The problem might mean that the evaporation rate is so slow that the blocks are almost in equilibrium all the time, that is the weight and buoyant force are balanced. Find the immersion depth of the big cube at time t when the side length of the small block is a-αt. In this case, the velocity is the time derivative of the immersion depth.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top