What is the volume and surface area of a 1-D sphere?

lostidentity
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find the volume and surface area of a 1-D dimensional sphere, i.e. retaining only the radial dependence.

I know that the volume element for a 3-D sphere would be

dV = r^2\sin\theta{d}\theta{d}\phi{d}r

If it's one-dimensional would it just be dV = r^2{d}r? Or would it just be dr?

With regards to the surface area vector in 3-D it is

d\boldsymbol{A} = r^2\sin\theta{d}\theta{d}\phi\hat{\boldsymbol{e}_r}

so in 1-D would it be

d\boldsymbol{A} = r^2\hat{\boldsymbol{e}_r} or would it just be \hat{\boldsymbol{e}_r}?


Essentially what I'm trying to do is a Finite Volume Method for a 1-D sphere and I want to find the surface area vectors, and volume for my Finite Volume Cells.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi lostidentity! :smile:

perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but if a 3D sphere is an ordinary sphere, then isn't a 2D sphere an ordinary circle, and a 1D sphere a pair of points at positions ± r from the origin?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi lostidentity! :smile:

perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but if a 3D sphere is an ordinary sphere, then isn't a 2D sphere an ordinary circle, and a 1D sphere a pair of points at positions ± r from the origin?
I think lostidentity is using "sphere" to mean "ball" and "2D sphere" to mean "disk".

If so by "1D sphere" he must an interval which has two points as "surface". In that case, the "volume element" of a "1D sphere" would be just "dx" and there is no "surface area element" since the surface is not continuous.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top