What is the Wedge Product and How is it Defined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
I'm confused about the wording of this problem,

They define the wedge product by u \wedge v = u\otimes v - v\otimes u but as far as I can tell this operation is not associative!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdstokes said:
I'm confused about the wording of this problem,

They define the wedge product by u \wedge v = u\otimes v - v\otimes u but as far as I can tell this operation is not associative!

They have not tried to define an associative algebra, i.e., the exterior algebra, in this question.

They have defined meanings for the the abstract symbols u \wedge v, u \wedge v \wedge w, and u \wedge v \wedge w \wedge x, where u, v, w, and x are all arbitrary vectors.

Their definitions can be extended to the definition of the exterior algebra, but this is not needed to do the question.
 
If the operation is not associative then an expression such as u \wedge v \wedge w is not defined because the order of operations is not specified.
 
jdstokes said:
If the operation is not associative then an expression such as u \wedge v \wedge w is not defined because the order of operations is not specified.

They have defined what this symbol means. Don't think of it as the product of two wedges, think of it as one symbol.

Consider all possible permutations of the juxtaposed symbols uvw. Stick a + in front of the permutation if it is an even permutation of uvw and and a - in front if the permutation is odd. Add all the terms, and insert tensor product symbols.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top