What is the working principle of wire grid polarizers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter allister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Skin Skin effect
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the working principle of wire grid polarizers and the behavior of electric current in conductors. It clarifies that while the skin depth formula indicates a uniform current distribution, the lack of an electric field inside a conductor, as per Maxwell's equations, leads to confusion regarding electron movement. Additionally, it emphasizes that the immediate lighting of a bulb upon switching on is due to the propagation of the electromagnetic wave along the conductor's periphery, despite the slow drift velocity of electrons. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these electromagnetic principles in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Maxwell's equations
  • Skin depth in conductors
  • Drift velocity of electrons
  • Electromagnetic wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Maxwell's equations on conductor behavior
  • Explore the concept of skin depth in AC versus DC circuits
  • Investigate the principles of wire grid polarizers in optics
  • Learn about the relationship between drift velocity and current flow in circuits
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and their applications in circuit design and optical technologies.

allister
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello forum,
I have a few doubts on EM.
1. The skin depth formula for constant current(DC) shows that there can be current uniformly distributed through the cross-section of a conductor.However as there can be no electric field within a conductor(as per Maxwell's equations) there can be no force on the electrons within a conductor and the electrons do not move inside the conductor and so there is no current inside a conductor.These two facts seem contradictory.
2. Also,if it is so that current flows inside a conductor,the drift velocity of electrons is too slow.Is it the EM wave on the periphery of the conductor that causes a bulb to light as soon as it is switched on?
3. I am a bit confused about the working principle of wire grid polarizers. Maxwell's equations says that there shall be a non zero magnetic field on the surface of a conductor as an EM wave is incident on it.That means there shall be a varying surface current density(i.e. motion of electrons).As those grids which have their grids parallel to the E vector allow that and thus satisfy Maxwell can reflect EM waves.Please correct me if I am wrong.

thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
allister said:
Hello forum,
I have a few doubts on EM.
1. The skin depth formula for constant current(DC) shows that there can be current uniformly distributed through the cross-section of a conductor.However as there can be no electric field within a conductor(as per Maxwell's equations) there can be no force on the electrons within a conductor and the electrons do not move inside the conductor and so there is no current inside a conductor.These two facts seem contradictory.

I don't think this applies to an electronic circuit, as it isn't a static situation.

2. Also,if it is so that current flows inside a conductor,the drift velocity of electrons is too slow.Is it the EM wave on the periphery of the conductor that causes a bulb to light as soon as it is switched on?

The drift velocity of the electrons may be slow, but current flows throughout the circuit all at once. Consider turning on the hot water faucet in your kitchen sink. Water starts to flow out of the faucet immediately, but it takes a while for the water from the hot water heater to get through the pipes to the faucet, so you have to wait a bit to get hot water. Current is similar. The drift velocity is slow, but when you initially flip the switch you have current flowing everywhere, including through the bulb.

I can't answer number three, sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K