What is the Y-coordinate of the extrema for cosh(x)+tanh(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric78
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the Y-coordinate of the extrema for the function cosh(x) + tanh(x), the critical points are determined by setting the derivative equal to zero, leading to a transcendental equation involving hyperbolic functions. The discussion highlights the challenge of solving the resulting fourth-order algebraic equation, x^3 + x + 1 = 0, which lacks simple roots. It is suggested that Cardano's formulas may be necessary to find all solutions, with at least one real solution expected in the interval (-1, 0). The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem but indicates a clear path forward for finding the extrema. Ultimately, the solution involves a mix of algebraic manipulation and numerical methods.
Eric78
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to find the Y-coordinate of the extrema of cosh(x)+tanh(x),

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Eric78 said:
Hi, I need to find the Y-coordinate of the extrema of cosh(x)+tanh(x),

Thanks!

You should be able to reduce everything to a fourth order algebraic equation with integer coefficents.
The condition for extrema (giving the critical points of the graphic) is
(\cosh x+\tanh x)'=0 which gives an transcedental equation in the hyperbolic functions \cosh x and \sinh x.Substitute the definiton of these functions and then make the substitution \exp x = \lambda.The equation for lambda is as i said and look for its positive roots.
 
Yes, I found x^3+x+1=0 where x=sinh(x), but there is no simple root, and I need a quite simple solution...
 
I'd hunt the root down in 2 steps:

1. The rational root test

and if no rational roots then...

2. http://www.math.sc.edu/cgi-bin/sumcgi/Newton.pl
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is my attempt at the problem:

y = \cosh x + \tanh x

y \cosh x = \cosh^2 x + \sinh x

y' \cosh x + y \sinh x = 2 \cosh x \sinh x + \cosh \x

y'=0

\cosh^2 x + \sinh x = 2 \cosh x \sinh \x + \cosh \x

\cosh^2 x + (\sinh x - \cosh x) - 2 \cosh x \sinh x = 0

\frac{e^{2x} + 2e^x - 2e^{-2x}}{4} + e^{-x} - \frac{e^{2x} - e^{-2x}}{2} = 0

e^{2x} + 2e^x - e^{-2x} + 4e^{-x} - 2e^{2x} + 2e^{-2x}=0

-e^{2x} + 2e^x + 4e^{-x} + e^{-2x}=0

-e^{4x} + 2e^{3x} + 4e^x + 1=0

Have I made a mistake or something? Looks pretty hard to me (although solvable exactly).
 
Eric78 said:
Yes, I found x^3+x+1=0 where x=sinh(x), but there is no simple root, and I need a quite simple solution...

You're right.This is the quations u should be getting.There is at least one solution in R(which should be negative and in the interval (-1,0)),but to find all of them u have to apply Cardano's formulas.My guess is the other two are complex.And sinh(x) can take only real values,so the path to finding the extremas is hopefully clear from now.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top