What is this antenna structure? (vertical bow tie)

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Structure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identification and performance of a vertical bow tie antenna, specifically the ClearStream 4 and ClearStream 2V models, designed for over-the-air digital TV reception. Participants note that the bow tie structure may enhance VHF band performance compared to traditional designs like the DB2, allowing it to function as a UHF+VHF combo antenna. The conversation also critiques the marketing strategies of antenna manufacturers, suggesting that aesthetics often overshadow actual performance. Additionally, some users share their experiences with older antennas, emphasizing the importance of optimized designs for specific transmit sites.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antenna types, specifically UHF and VHF antennas
  • Familiarity with digital TV transmission and reception
  • Knowledge of antenna design principles and performance metrics
  • Awareness of consumer electronics marketing strategies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and performance of the ClearStream 4 and ClearStream 2V antennas
  • Explore the differences between UHF and VHF antenna designs
  • Learn about antenna optimization techniques for specific transmit sites
  • Investigate consumer perceptions of antenna aesthetics versus performance
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, antenna designers, and consumers seeking to optimize their digital TV reception will benefit from this discussion.

berkeman
Admin
Messages
69,345
Reaction score
24,674
I saw this antenna on a residential rooftop yesterday (in the US). I'm guessing it is a over-the-air Digital TV antenna, but I don't recognize the vertical bow tie structure. The antenna is about half a meter tall. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Strange Antenna Closeup.jpg
    Strange Antenna Closeup.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 1,041
Engineering news on Phys.org
Very odd. I'd would just have to go and ask the residents of the home.
 
dlgoff said:
Very odd. I'd would just have to go and ask the residents of the home.

LOL. I was wearing my EMT uniform at the time (about 7AM on a Sunday morning). Probably would have scared the poor residents if I'd have knocked at the door! :smile:
 
Looks like a ClearStream 4 Antenna for Free Over-The-Air Digital and HD Programming.
It is operated with the reflector screen. The horizontal dipole is something extra.
 
Baluncore said:
Looks like a ClearStream 4 Antenna for Free Over-The-Air Digital and HD Programming.
It is operated with the reflector screen. The horizontal dipole is something extra.

Thanks! At least it looks like half of the ClearStream 4...

https://all-cryptothrift1.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/DSC_0572-300x200.jpg
https://all-cryptothrift1.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/DSC_0572-300x200.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the makers claim better performance in the VHF band than a traditional bowtie-plus-reflector design such as the DB2, enough to market it as a UHF+VHF combo antenna rather than as a UHF antenna that has some ability to receive VHF.

It came out a few years ago, around the time of the US analog-to-digital TV transition.
 
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman, then secondly, and of little importance is to catch fish.

Like a fishing lure, the thing that is really important in consumer antenna design is style and looks. It is most unlikely that the antenna performs better, but to be commercial it must look new and different.

It is probably just an old style simple antenna underneath.
Don't get distracted by their marketing hype and the unusual plastic style.
 
Baluncore said:
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman

Well it sure worked on me! :biggrin:
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
I think the makers claim better performance in the VHF band than a traditional bowtie-plus-reflector design such as the DB2, enough to market it as a UHF+VHF combo antenna rather than as a UHF antenna that has some ability to receive VHF.

It came out a few years ago, around the time of the US analog-to-digital TV transition.

Baluncore said:
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman, then secondly, and of little importance is to catch fish.

Like a fishing lure, the thing that is really important in consumer antenna design is style and looks. It is most unlikely that the antenna performs better, but to be commercial it must look new and different.

It is probably just an old style simple antenna underneath.
Don't get distracted by their marketing hype and the unusual plastic style.
I feel sorry for all the folks that trashed their old UHF-VHF "analog" antennas. I'm receiving 45 digital channels with an antenna like this.
0007900031382_500X500.jpg


from http://www.walmart.com
 
  • #11
I remember when colour TV arrived, gone was the brown cardboard box for the new antenna, the antenna came in a white box with bright red, green and blue coloured printing. Looking at the antenna, it had brightly coloured insulator blocks, no more of that UV stable black stuff. Apart from that, absolutely nothing changed.

When digital TV arrived I designed antennas optimised for each different transmit site in this corner of the state, they are manufactured locally and installed by antenna installers based on the transmit site name. The engineering can be optimised because there is no direct sale to a customer. Because I can optimise for a specific site's band, gain, beamwidth, and F/B ratio, others who buy fancy expensive antennas from a catalogue, cannot get better reception.

The internet is a sewer that flows into your office. TV is a sewer that flows into your lounge room.
Whichever way you look at it, you need a significantly better crap detector to handle the bigger pipe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
16K
Replies
4
Views
4K