What is wrong with following physics equations? (velocity and acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the correct application of physics equations related to velocity and acceleration. The user initially presents several equations but questions the validity of their formulation, particularly the expression for height (h). It is clarified that the equation Vf=at is only accurate when the initial velocity (Vi) is zero, which is not the case in their scenario. The correct formulation should be Vf=Vi+at, which incorporates the initial velocity. The user acknowledges the mistake and seeks to understand the fundamental units of acceleration in relation to the equations presented.
Selfphysicslearner
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
vavg=(Vi+Vf)/2
vavg=h/t
then vavg*t=h
h=(Vi+Vf)/2 * t
Vf=at
(Vit+at2)*1/2=h
But formula on every resource I found says it should be;
(Vit+at2*1/2)=h
What mistake did I do ?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled3.png
    Untitled3.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 175
Physics news on Phys.org
Selfphysicslearner said:
Vf=at
Is it?
Are you missing anything here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
Likes Ibix
Selfphysicslearner said:
Vf=at
This is not generally correct.
 
cnh1995 said:
Is it?
Are you missing anything here?
I see it must be actually:Vf=Vi+at then there is 2 Vi in formula which eliminates 1/2 multiplied makes it
h=1/at^2 +2*1/2Vi
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995 and Dale
What are the fundamental units of acceleration?
 
Selfphysicslearner said:
vavg=(Vi+Vf)/2
vavg=h/t
then vavg*t=h
h=(Vi+Vf)/2 * t
Vf=at
(Vit+at2)*1/2=h
But formula on every resource I found says it should be;
(Vit+at2*1/2)=h
What mistake did I do ?
Vf=at , this equation means final velocity = acceleration * time. This can happen only if initial velocity is 0, but in the equation Vi is the initial velocity and Vi is not 0 as per the equations wrriten.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top