What Is Wrong with My Approach to Solving This Electrostatics Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an electrostatics problem involving a charge density of 1/r within a sphere of radius R. The user attempts to apply Gauss's law to derive the electric field (E) and electric potential (Φ) both inside and outside the sphere. The correct approach reveals that the charge density requires a proportionality constant to maintain proper units, which affects the calculations of E and Φ. The electric field inside the radius R is constant in magnitude, while the potential must be recalculated to account for the correct charge density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field and potential concepts
  • Knowledge of charge density and its implications
  • Basic calculus for integration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields using Gauss's law
  • Study the relationship between charge density and electric potential
  • Learn about the implications of charge distribution on electric fields
  • Explore examples of electrostatics problems involving non-uniform charge densities
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and potentials in relation to varying charge densities.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This should be simple: We have a charge density in some region of space, r< R (R is some known constant), that goes like 1/r. Everywhere else, the charge density is zero. I need to find the electric field and potential everywhere. The total charge is Q, assumed to be known.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see why I can't just use Gauss's law to find E and integrate to find Phi.

For r>R, the problem is really simple: the total enclosed charge is Q, so
\vec{E(r)} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r^2} \hat{r}

potential is just \Phi = \frac{-Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r}

For r <R, we draw a Gaussian surface of radius r. Then Gauss's law should give

E (4 \pi r^2) = Q_{enc}/\epsilon0 = \frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon0} \int_0^r r^2 \frac{1}{r} dr = 2 \pi r^2 \rightarrow \vec{E(r)} = \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} \hat{r}

Potential would be:

\Phi = - \int_R^r E \cdot dl = - \int_R^r \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} dr = \frac{-(r-R)}{2 \epsilon0}

So, these don't seem correct to me at all. E has no r-dependence, and worse, the wrong units! What am I doing wrong here? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge density inside R is proportional to 1/r, but you need to calculate the proportionality constant, which will have units of charge/area (since this constant divide by r has units of charge/volume). This will fix the units. In fact the E-field is constant in magnitude (but not in direction) inside R.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
768
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K