What is wrong with this flux integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter james weaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Integral
james weaver
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
I think the issue is how I parameterize my vector field, but not quite sure. In case you were wondering, this is problem # 27, chapter 16.7 of the 8th edition of Stewart. Thanks for any help.

1651694133448.png

1651694182004.png

1651694211040.png
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is that you add an additional ##r## in your surface element. This is presumably because you think that in polar coordinates you need to use ##r\,dr\,d\theta## for the area element, but the ##r## is already accounted for in the cross product ##\vec r_r \times \vec r_\theta##. (Consider the flux of ##\hat j## through ##y=0## and ##x^2+z^2 \leq 1##, which should clearly be -up to a sign depending on normal direction- ##\int r \, dr\, d\theta## over the same ranges of ##r## and ##\theta## as you have.)

Generally, the surface element as parametrized by ##t## and ##s## is given by
$$
d\vec S = \vec r_t \times \vec r_s \, dt\, ds
$$
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and james weaver
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top