rhuthwaite
- 62
- 1
Thats strange I might try that! The only time I learned to do things stacatto was on the piano... you must be musical
Danger said:As long as I'm wearing nose plugs...![]()
Looks like a taco, smells like fish, tastes like chicken, and they say that you're not supposed to eat it...?![]()
I wasn't taught that way, but it sounds like a good way to avoid typos. I think it would be easier to type by letter when typing up something written by someone else than when you're composing from your own thoughts. When I'm typing my own thoughts, I'm thinking words and typing letters...not at all sure how my fingers know what they're doing.Danger said:Just out of curiosity, was anyone else taught to type staccato, to music? My teacher played marching tunes such a Sousa. He taught us to work like a 3-round-burst Baretta. (Type about 5-8 characters per second, pause for 1/4 or 1/2 second, then take another blast at it.) We were also taught to treat each character individually, rather than a whole word at a time. To this day, I spell out the words as I type them.
NoTime said:IIRC typing WPM is based on a standard average word length of 5 characters.
So multiplying WPM by 6 (counting the space) gives characters per minute.
If you're doing shorthand the word length is shorter, so you should be able to type more words.
I don't know what the standard shorthand word length is.
Without that information a comparison is meaningless.
edit to add quote
Alkatran said:I take this test every once in awhile and always score around 100 wpm. That's all good and great, but how useful is this test, really?
I almost never come across cases where I need to blindly copy words from a page to a computer, so what's the point of measuring my typing speed on that type of task? I know I can't think up text to write at 100 wpm, so what does it matter that I type that fast?