What kind of energy do I possess when I exert a force?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Brownian notions
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of energy when a force is exerted, particularly in scenarios where an individual or a robot is pushing against a stationary object, such as walls. Participants explore concepts related to work, energy conversion, and the physiological aspects of exerting force without displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that when a person pushes against a wall without moving it, they are not doing work, yet they experience fatigue due to energy conversion in their muscles.
  • Others argue that in a steady state, there is no kinetic energy involved, only heat energy is produced.
  • A participant proposes that a human bone could resist force indefinitely without an energy source, implying that energy conversion is not necessary for exerting force.
  • There is a discussion about whether energy conversion occurs when exerting a static force, with some asserting that no energy is involved in static equilibrium.
  • One participant mentions that a book on a shelf exerts force without expending energy, drawing a parallel to the human experience of exerting force.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that friction involves energy transfer at a molecular level, suggesting a conversion of chemical energy to electrostatic energy when a robot pushes against a wall.
  • Some participants clarify that for energy to be transferred, there must be displacement in the direction of the force.
  • There is mention of the subjective experience of exerting force, noting that humans are not ideal machines and can feel different levels of exertion under similar conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether energy conversion occurs when a force is exerted without displacement. Some agree that no energy is converted in static situations, while others introduce complexities regarding energy dissipation and molecular interactions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about static equilibrium, the definitions of work and energy, and the nuances of physiological responses to exertion. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or conceptual intricacies involved in energy transfer during static force application.

Brownian notions
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
If I'm trapped between 2 walls, and I am pushing outwards such that I just balance the force, I am not doing work on the walls but I'm getting tired.

This is because chemical potential energy is converted into... kinetic energy (within muscles?) and heat energy right?

What if I replace the human with a battery powered robot?

1. What energy is the chemical potential energy of the batteries converted into?
2. How is it possible that the robot is exerting a force without "transferring" any energy?

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Brownian notions said:
converted into... kinetic energy (within muscles?) and heat energy right?
No kinetic energy in the steady state. Just heat.

Robot idem. Possible because battery power is dissipated into heat.
 
Brownian notions said:
If I'm trapped between 2 walls, and I am pushing outwards such that I just balance the force, I am not doing work on the walls but I'm getting tired.

This is because chemical potential energy is converted into... kinetic energy (within muscles?) and heat energy right?

What if I replace the human with a battery powered robot?

1. What energy is the chemical potential energy of the batteries converted into?
2. How is it possible that the robot is exerting a force without "transferring" any energy?

Thanks!

If you had a human bone handy, you could jam that between the walls and the force could be resisted indefinitely without an energy source.

The energy in your muscles is essentially used to keep your joints rigid.
 
Thanks both of you.

Im a bit confused now:

PeroK said:
the force could be resisted indefinitely
But this bone would be exerting force outwards right?
Am I right to say that there is no energy conversion going on here, but there is still a force being exerted outwards?

BvU said:
kinetic energy in the steady state. Just heat.
I've heard that some energy is converted to kinetic energy within muscles for contraction etc, because otherwise it seems like there would be a LOT of heat produced?
 
Brownian notions said:
Thanks both of you.

Im a bit confused now:But this bone would be exerting force outwards right?
Am I right to say that there is no energy conversion going on here, but there is still a force being exerted outwards?
?

There is no energy involved. Not in static equilibrium.
 
A book on a shelf exerts a force on it without expending any energy.

Energy might be expended contracting muscle but after they have finished contracting they can continue to generate a force without suddenly getting a lot hotter.
 
The basic equations are:

Work=force*displacement
Power=force*velocity

The walls aren't moving so you are doing no work on them. It might not feel like that but humans are not ideal machines. We consume a lot of energy even while asleep.

Humans are also rather bad measuring instruments... If you ride a bike up a hill twice, it can feel easy or hard depending on what gear the bike is in. This is true even if you ride up at the same speed both times so you are generating the same power.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Brownian notions said:
Am I right to say that there is no energy conversion going on here, but there is still a force being exerted outwards?
Yes. A static force does not require energy. For energy to be transferred there must be a displacement in the direction of the force.
 
Brownian notions said:
What if I replace the human with a battery powered robot?
when the robot is trying to push the walls apart- the cement and other stuff is holding the structure together- so you can roughly say- the friction forces are acting as reaction forces(wherein action is force caused by the robot)
So, now for understanding the involved energy transfer - think about the molecular basis of friction - friction is resultant of lots and lots of minuscule electrostatic forces between any two surfaces. i.e shearing two contact surfaces will cause breaking and making of electrostatic bonds
Hence, finally, we can say - the chemical energy is being converted to electrostatic energy(very rough model)
 
  • #10
No. Wall don't move ##\Rightarrow## no energy is converted.
 
  • #11
Thanks guys, i think i get it now. Really appreciate the help!
 
  • #12
BvU said:
No. Wall don't move ##\Rightarrow## no energy is converted.
Yes, the wall doesn't move, but there is some temporary deflection (few micro/nanometers) which we cannot notice!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 236 ·
8
Replies
236
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K