What made the scientists to think about Antimatter

  • Thread starter Thread starter mubashirmansoor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
AI Thread Summary
Scientists were led to the concept of antimatter through Paul Dirac's 1928 equation for the electron, which revealed negative energy solutions. This prompted the idea of a "Dirac sea," where a hole in this sea would correspond to a positively charged particle, later identified as the positron. Currently, antimatter has no practical applications beyond research due to its high production costs and difficulties in containment. While it holds potential as a power source, this remains theoretical. The standard model of particle physics confirms that every particle has a corresponding antiparticle, with opposite quantum numbers but equal mass.
mubashirmansoor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...
And what's the use of it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mubashirmansoor said:
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...

I'am not to sure there is a modifed veriosn ofE = m c^2 with E = - or + m c^2 I think they created it in particle acceltor's.
And what's the use of it?

There's currently no use for it other then research.It is very expensive and hard to produce and it hard to keep in container.It is possible to use it as power source but not yet if ever.
 
Read up on the ideas of Dirac. He's pretty much accrediated with the prediction of antimatter.
 
From Wikipedia:

In 1928 Paul Dirac developed a relativistic equation for the electron, now known as the Dirac equation. Curiously, the equation was found to have negative energy solutions in addition to the normal positive ones. This presented a problem, as electrons tend toward the lowest possible energy level; energies of negative infinity are nonsensical. As a way of getting around this, Dirac proposed that the vacuum can be considered a "sea" of negative energy, the Dirac sea. Any electrons would therefore have to sit on top of the sea.

Thinking further, Dirac found that a "hole" in the sea would have a positive charge. At first he thought that this was the proton, but Hermann Weyl pointed out the hole should have the same mass as the electron. The existence of this particle, the positron, was confirmed experimentally in 1932 by Carl D. Anderson.

Today's standard model shows that every particle has an antiparticle, for which each additive quantum number has the negative of the value it has for the normal matter particle. The sign reversal applies only to quantum numbers (properties) which are additive, such as charge, but not to mass, for example. The positron has the opposite charge but the same mass as the electron. An atom of antihydrogen is composed of a negatively-charged antiproton being orbited by a positively-charged positron .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top