I What makes a field theory relativistic?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
356
Reaction score
33
It is my understanding that in both Classical Field Theory and QFT the Lagrangian must be Lorentz invariant in order for the fields to be considered relativistic. Buy what about the field itself (φ or ψ)? As complex-valued functions of space and time do they also have to be Lorentz invariant?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes ftr
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you understand Lorentz covariance (no problem if not, I'll explain).

They must be Lorentz covariant, but not necessarily Lorentz invariant, i.e. they can transform as a vector or a one-form but they don't have to be a scalar.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
referframe said:
As complex-valued functions of space and time

Do you mean how portability is affected by reference frame.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
182
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
87
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top