MaxManus
- 268
- 1
Hey, in my Schaum' Outline Calculus it says Dx(ex) = ex
Let y = ex. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, \frac{1}{y}y' = 1
therefor y' = y = exFor a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f-1(y) = ey.
Note that f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}. By Theorem 10.2(b).
(f-1)'(y) = \frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))},
That is Dy = \frac{1}{1/e**y} = ey
10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:
If f'x(x0 is differentiable and f'(x0) != 0, then f-1 is
differentiable at y0 = f(x0) and (f-1)'(y0)
= \frac{1}{f'(x0}
Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.
Let y = ex. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, \frac{1}{y}y' = 1
therefor y' = y = exFor a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f-1(y) = ey.
Note that f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}. By Theorem 10.2(b).
(f-1)'(y) = \frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))},
That is Dy = \frac{1}{1/e**y} = ey
10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:
If f'x(x0 is differentiable and f'(x0) != 0, then f-1 is
differentiable at y0 = f(x0) and (f-1)'(y0)
= \frac{1}{f'(x0}
Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.
Last edited: