What Material absorbs shock better? Rubber or plastic?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparative shock absorption capabilities of rubber versus plastic materials in the context of phone cases. Participants explore the implications of material choice on the protection of devices during impacts, considering various types of plastics and rubbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the type of plastic significantly affects its shock absorption properties, with hard plastics like ABS and polystyrene being more prone to breaking under impact.
  • Others argue that rubber materials, such as neoprene and silicone, are better suited for shock absorption due to their inherent properties, which are utilized in applications like tires and vibration isolation.
  • A participant raises a question about the effectiveness of plastic cases in preventing impact energy transfer to the phone, indicating a concern for the phone's protection rather than the case's durability.
  • There is a mention of the historical context of plastic use in manufacturing phone cases, highlighting economic factors and the shift towards disposable technology, which may influence material choices.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the quantification of shock energy transmitted to the phone, suggesting that manufacturers may not prioritize this information in their designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of rubber versus plastic for shock absorption, with no consensus reached on which material is superior. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific impact performance of each material type.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the variability in plastic types and their properties, as well as the economic factors influencing material selection in manufacturing. There is also an acknowledgment of the lack of available data on shock energy transmission to devices.

Jack7122
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For example a phone in a case is dropped, would it suffer more in a plastic case or a rubber case?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depends on what kind of plastic. Most of the hard plastics like ABS and polystyrene are subject to breaking or shattering if the impact is energetic enough. If your case was made from puffy polystyrene like packing peanuts, it would probably survive at least one impact, but it wouldn't be too durable in the long run.

There's a reason rubber is used for things like tires and vibration isolation, rather than plastic.
 
I'm not too sure about the types of plastic used for the hard cases, but I know neoprene rubber, sillicone, and TPU (Thermoplastic polyurethane) are often used for the soft cases.

The plastic cases definitely seem like they would be more brittle and prone to cracking, but would they prevent impact energy transfer to a phone during a drop/hit more effectively?

The case itself breaking wouldn't be a problem as long as the phone doesn't get damaged, I'm more interested in how much shock energy would get to the actual phone with the different materials.
 
Plastics like ABS and polystyrene are very commonly used to make cases for phones, calculators, etc. There is a long history of using such materials and they used to be fairly cheap to use in manufacturing, but since the basic ingredients are made from petroleum or natural gas, plastics like ABS and PS have become more expensive in recent years.

IDK how much shock energy is transmitted to the phone mechanism. I don't think the manufacturers know or care either. They make money by selling you a new phone periodically. Adding new features to the basic phone also helps to create a demand for new phones, and there are many people who must have the latest gadget. The days of having a phone company install a basic handset which would last for decades are gone for good. It's a disposable world now, baby.

There may be some shock-proof phones available. They probably wouldn't look too sleek, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K