What Mistake Am I Making in Calculating Fringe Width?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of fringe width in an interference pattern, specifically addressing the confusion regarding the correct formula and interpretation of measurements related to dark fringes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify their understanding of fringe width by comparing two formulas and questioning their application. Participants discuss the interpretation of measurements and the definition of fringe width.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of fringe width, suggesting that the original poster may have marked the width incorrectly. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of the measurements taken.

Contextual Notes

There is a potential misunderstanding regarding the distinction between the width of a single fringe versus the measurements taken between multiple fringes. The original poster's calculations and assumptions are under scrutiny, with references to visual aids for clarification.

cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=35479&stc=1&d=1305217898.png



so here i have shown the distances of two dark fringes ...

from here ... fringe width is \frac{\lambda L}{2d}
L is distance of screen ... d is distance b/w 2 fringes.

but fringe width is \frac{\lambda L}{d} , right ?

What mistake am i making?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 558
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the question?
 
i wrote it above

by using formula of distance of dark fringe ...

fringe width comes out to be ... <br /> \frac{\lambda L}{2d}<br />

but fringe width is <br /> \frac{\lambda L}{d}<br />

so why am i getting wrong answer
 
hello ... someone?
 
The fringe width is the distance between the centres of alternate dark(or bright) fringes.
Lamda D/d as marked on your diagram goes from the centre of a bright fringe to the centre of an adjacent dark fringe in other words you have marked in half the fringe width.
 
So you mean this is fringe width ??
attachment.php?attachmentid=35509&stc=1&d=1136054234.png

well this looks satisfying
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 706
cupid.callin said:
So you mean this is fringe width ??
attachment.php?attachmentid=35509&stc=1&d=1136054234.png

well this looks satisfying

You have now marked the fringe width correctly.
 
are you sure?
because fringe width means "width of 1 fringe"
but (as you said) i have marked width of 2 fringes
 
I did not say you marked in the width of two fringes I said you marked in the width of half a fringe.The fringe width as marked above in red is correct since it goes from the centre of a bright fringe to the centre of an adjacent bright fringe.
Look at a graph of how the intensity varies smoothly across an interference pattern and this should clarify things for you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K