A What motivates famous mathematicians?

themasterchief
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.
Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
themasterchief said:
TL;DR Summary: Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.

Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
I think this guy enjoyed his mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Erdős
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint and FactChecker
themasterchief said:
TL;DR Summary: Math undergrad who would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research, but wondering if any successful mathematicians have such an attitude.

Hi all, I am a math undergraduate who studies math solely when I crave dopamine — when I feel a “kiddish,” soaring excitement. As a result, however, I am unable to focus for consistent, long periods of time and thus succeed at research. For this reason, would any of you happen to know if any successful mathematicians feel a kiddish excitement about their work, treating it less like work and lore like play? (And if so, whether you might have some concrete examples?) Or if there are no such mathematicians, what motivates them, if they don’t feel a kiddish excitement on a day-to-day basis?

TLDR: Ultimately, I would like to treat my work like play, like I am a kid ‘living out my dreams’ when doing research. If that’s tough in practice, though, knowing now, before grad school, would be extremely clarifying and deeply appreciated.
The problem is less the attitude as it is the toolbox! A wise man once told me, "You might have a brilliant idea at night, but you need to sit down and work on it in the morning!" The working part is crucial, and to work efficiently, you need a big toolbox, the bigger the better. This frequently occurs to me when I read Tao's blog and his theorems. It is playing with ideas at first glance, but a closer look reveals the incredible background that he has where he takes the proof techniques from. Playing with an idea is one thing, knowing possible theorems and techniques that could be applicable is another.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Bosko, pinball1970 and FactChecker
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top