What must the resultant of the two tension forces in the ropes be?

AI Thread Summary
The resultant of the two tension forces in the ropes must equal 500N to counteract the gravitational force on the load. The tensions in the ropes are not equal due to differing angles, which affects their respective magnitudes. To solve for the tension in each rope, a free-body diagram should be drawn, and Newton's second law applied in both the x and y directions. The y-components of the tensions must add up to 500N, while the x-components will balance each other out. Understanding the equilibrium conditions is essential for determining the individual tensions.
VanKwisH
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/3378/14906417xg0.th.png
A) What must the resultant of the two tension forces in the ropes be?
B)What is the magnitude and direction of the tension in each of the two ropes?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For A ... shouldn't the tensions in the ropes equal 500N?? cause they need to oppose the force of gravity on the load...
and i have no idea where to start for B anyone know ??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
for A, because it has 2 ropes, and they are not equal , so it's not 500N
 
ahhhh but what if it was one rope ?
also the rope connects to a central point which is the hook ...
so wouldn't the tension remain constant throughout the whole rope?
 
dont you see the hook is at the connecting point of 2 ropes?
the 2 ropes added up to 500N.
but then one rope is longer, and one is shorter, so the force they contain is different too
 
alright ... the tensions are not equal ... but they should add up to 500 N right??

Edit : Also for each tension ... is it the overall tension ... or the Y direction of the tensions??
 
bump...
 
The tensions' y-components add up to 500N.

Draw a free-body diagram for the mass and write out Newton's 2nd law in the x and y directions.
 
the y-components are not equal though right??
 
No, because the angles are different.
 
  • #10
awvvu said:
No, because the angles are different.

huh... i said " they are NOT EQUAL " ...
since they are at different angles they are not the same right??
but where would i start at this problem??
 
  • #11
VanKwisH said:
huh... i said " they are NOT EQUAL " ...
since they are at different angles they are not the same right??
but where would i start at this problem??

Yeah, I'm saying you're right, they aren't equal.

Read what I said earlier, 'Draw a free-body diagram for the mass and write out Newton's 2nd law in the x and y directions.'
 
  • #12
alright i got the FBD ... but for Newton's 2nd law ...
are u talking about the Fnet = ma in the x and y direction or a different one??
 
  • #13
VanKwisH said:
alright i got the FBD ... but for Newton's 2nd law ...
are u talking about the Fnet = ma in the x and y direction or a different one??

Yes, write out the net forces in the x and y direction. Not sure what you're asking.
 
  • #14
alright is it
Fnetx = fax + fbx = 0N
Fnety = fay + fby + fg = 0N
cause it's in equilibirum right??
 
  • #15
Yep.
 
  • #16
still doesn't make any sense to me ... :S i don't have an Fa nor Fb
so i can't use trig ... what do i do next?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top