What Path Do Particles Take in an Inelastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision between two particles of equal mass and speed, momentum conservation dictates that the total x-component of momentum remains constant while the total energy decreases. This results in a reduction of the y-velocity components, leading to smaller scattering angles. Consequently, one particle travels through region B and the other through region C, maintaining symmetry about the x-axis. The final speeds are lower than the initial speeds due to the loss of kinetic energy in the collision. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the paths taken by the particles post-collision.
AntMantis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows an overhead view of two particles sliding at constant velocity over a frictionless surface. The particles have the same mass and the same initial speed v = 4.00 m/s, and they collide where their paths intersect. An x-axis is arranged to bisect the angle between their incoming paths, so that q = 40.0°. The region to the right of the collision is divided into four lettered sections by the x-axis and four numbered dashed lines. In what region or along what line do the particles travel if the collision is inelastic?

http://www.lowellphysics.org/beta/Textbook%20Resources/Chapter%209.%20Center%20of%20Mass%20and%20Linear%20Momentum/Problems/c09x9_14.xform_files/nw0484-n.gif


Answer:
Here the final speeds are less than they were initially. The total x-component cannot
be less, however, by momentum conservation, so the loss of speed shows up as a
decrease in their y-velocity-components. This leads to smaller angles of scattering.
Consequently, one particle travels through region B, the other through region C; the paths
are symmetric about the x-axis.



How did they get this answer? A step-by-step proof would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi AntMantis! Welcome to PF! :smile:
AntMantis said:
Answer:
Here the final speeds are less than they were initially. The total x-component cannot be less, however, by momentum conservation, so the loss of speed shows up as a decrease in their y-velocity-components. This leads to smaller angles of scattering. Consequently, one particle travels through region B, the other through region C; the paths are symmetric about the x-axis.

That answer is really confusing. :redface:

(Is it the official answer?)

If the final paths are symmetric about the x-axis, then their x-components are fixed, the same as the initial x-components.

Since the total energy is less, the y-components must be less … that's all there is to it. :smile:

Except I don't understand why the final paths have to be symmetric. :confused:
 
Thanks! Yes, that is the answer in the book, which I do not understand. So, does the total x-component have to be the same because the masses are originally traveling with the same x-velocity components? Also, how do I come to the conclusion that the final speeds are less than
they were initially? Is there a way to show this with the law of conservation of linear momentum?
 
AntMantis said:
So, does the total x-component have to be the same because the masses are originally traveling with the same x-velocity components?

Yes, both the total x-component and the total y-component have to be the same because momentum is always conserved in collisions.

(The total y-component of course is zero.)
Also, how do I come to the conclusion that the final speeds are less than
they were initially? Is there a way to show this with the law of conservation of linear momentum?

Since the x-component is the same, if the y-component was the same or greater, then the total speed would be the same or greater, and so the energy would be the same or greater.

But we know the energy is less. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top