FORTRAN 95 is recommended for those studying astrophysics, but C++ is considered more crucial for computational astrophysics. Most new code is developed in C++, which offers advanced features and libraries, such as boost::math, that are not available in FORTRAN. C++ is viewed as essential for industrial applications, akin to knowing English. Additionally, there is a question about the relevance of Java in computational astrophysics, indicating interest in multiple programming languages within the field.
#1
abbeynewton
31
0
Hi, just wanted to know which version of FORTRAN is best to learn for one studying astrophysics...and whether C++ is of any importance in computational astrophysics...Thanks
Also I'd argue that C++ is more important than FORTRAN for people interested in computational astrophysics. All of the new code is being written in C++ rather than FORTRAN, because everything you can do in FORTRAN you can do in C++ whereas the reverse is not true. There is incredible cutting edge stuff in C++ that doesn't exist in FORTRAN. (look at the boost::math libraries)
Also knowing C++ is like knowing English. It's the standard language for industrial applications.
#3
abbeynewton
31
0
thanks, one more question, is java also used in computational astrophysics?
I will be entering engineering but i want to do graduate studies in physics after it so im searching for the branch with most physics so it would be abit easier of a transition. Im trying to decide between nuclear engineering or electronics and engineering
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses.
Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem?
Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...