What Qualifies Someone as a Mathematician?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nukeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematician
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around defining what it means to be a mathematician. There is no universally accepted definition; it varies based on individual perspectives. Some argue that having a degree in mathematics, such as a BSc or MSc, qualifies someone as a mathematician, while others believe that original research or a PhD is necessary for that title. The conversation also touches on similar criteria for physicists, suggesting that practical engagement in the field, whether in academia or industry, contributes to one's identity as a mathematician or physicist. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that if someone practices mathematics or physics, they can consider themselves part of that profession, though professional recognition may require specific qualifications or contributions.
nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
To be a mathematician, what do you have to do? Just get a BSc in Math? Or does it require a PhD ?

Just curious. Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a pretty nonsensical/uninteresting question. It depends on what you mean by "being a mathematician", there is no universal definition thereof. Having done original research might be part of such a definition, and most BSc students don't have this (but some do).
 
Landau said:
That's a pretty nonsensical/uninteresting question. It depends on what you mean by "being a mathematician", there is no universal definition thereof. Having done original research might be part of such a definition, and most BSc students don't have this (but some do).

THanks,

What I meant is, if someone said they were a Mathematician, what does that mean? THey have a Degree In math? Type of work? Research? PHd in math? What does it take to call your self a mathematician?

Same with a physicist? What makes a physicist a physicist ?
 
I think it means that they at least have a degree in mathematics. I would consider someone with a MSc in mathematics and a job outside of academia involving some mathematics still a mathematician. But other people might only call someone a mathematician if he has a PhD and is doing research at a university.
 
a book on how to be a magician i read as a kid suggested that you are a magician if you can do one trick well. so maybe a mathematician is someone who has discovered or proved one result semi - independently?

or maybe you are one if you think you are?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top